2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-004-0591-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of isomeric equilibria formed by metal ion complexes of 8-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]-8-azaadenine (8,8aPMEA) and 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]-8-azaadenine (9,8aPMEA). Derivatives of the antiviral nucleotide analogue 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]adenine (PMEA)

Abstract: Quantification of isomeric equilibria formed by metal ion complexes of 8-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]-8-azaadenine (8,8aPMEA) and 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]-8-azaadenine (9,8aPMEA). Derivatives of the antiviral nucleotide analogue 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy) ethyl]adenine (PMEA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[47] In contrast, divalent transition metal ions are expected [36,37,46] to coordinate not only to N7 but also to N3 in an innersphere manner. Indeed, there are several examples where a kinetically inert Pt II ion coordinates to an adenine N3, [48][49][50] but the corresponding observation has also been made with labile metal ions like Cu II , [51] and if a further suitable guiding binding site, like in several antivirally active nucleotide analogues is available, N3 coordination may become common, [42,52,53] which, knowing the intrinsic basicity of N3, is no real surprise anymore. Inner-sphere binding to N7 is well known [45,47] and has often been observed for adenine nucleotides which undergo macrochelate formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[47] In contrast, divalent transition metal ions are expected [36,37,46] to coordinate not only to N7 but also to N3 in an innersphere manner. Indeed, there are several examples where a kinetically inert Pt II ion coordinates to an adenine N3, [48][49][50] but the corresponding observation has also been made with labile metal ions like Cu II , [51] and if a further suitable guiding binding site, like in several antivirally active nucleotide analogues is available, N3 coordination may become common, [42,52,53] which, knowing the intrinsic basicity of N3, is no real surprise anymore. Inner-sphere binding to N7 is well known [45,47] and has often been observed for adenine nucleotides which undergo macrochelate formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In other words, the formation degree of an isomer involving N3 coordination in Cu(PME2AP) is vanishingly small and thus the isomeric distributions given in Table 8 hold. Considering further that Cu 2+ has the largest affinity to N3, 72, 73 it is evident that the conclusions given in Sections 3.7 and 3.8 hold for all metal ions considered and that for M(PME2AP) complexes only the equilibrium scheme ( 16) is of relevance.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Coordinating Properties Of Pmea And Pme2apmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[29][30][31] This also applies for the equipment employed in the potentiometric pH titrations (see also below) and their evaluations, 31 as well as for the experimental procedures regarding the determination of the concentration of the NaOH, ligand, and metal-ionstock solutions. 29,32 2.2. Potentiometric pH Titrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability constants were calculated 35 considering the species H + , H 2 (PEEA) ( , H(PEEA) -, PEEA 2-, M 2+ , M(H;PEEA) + , and M(PEEA) by using the experimental data at every 0.1 pH unit in the pH range up to a 90% neutralization of H(PEEA) + or until the beginning of the hydrolysis of M(aq) 2+ ; the latter was clear from the titrations without the ligand. However, several of the constants given for the M(H;PEEA) + complexes, especially those for the alkaline earth ion complexes, must be considered as estimates 32 (see Table 2, below) because the formation degree of these species reached only about 3%; the maximum was reached for Mg(H;PEEA) + at 7%. In all of the other instances, the maximum formation degree of M(H;PEEA) + varied between about 5 and 30%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%