2014
DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-6623-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of iron-rich volcanogenic dust emissions and deposition over the ocean from Icelandic dust sources

Abstract: Abstract. Iceland has extremely active dust sources that result in large-scale emissions and deposition on land and at sea. The dust has a volcanogenic origin of basaltic composition with about 10 % Fe content. We used two independent methods to quantify dust emission from Iceland and dust deposition at sea. Firstly, the aerial extent (map) of deposition on land was extended to ocean areas around Iceland. Secondly, surveys of the number of dust events over the past decades and calculations of emissions and sea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(57 reference statements)
3
76
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the FLEX-DUST estimate for dust emissions in Iceland in years 2010 through 2012 in global simulations (4.8 Tg; Groot Zwaaftink et al, 2016). Dust emission rates are an order of magnitude lower than previous estimates of dust emission rates (30.5 to 40.1 Tg annually) presented by Arnalds et al (2014). Their estimate includes dust spikes and redistribution in relation to volcanic events and glacial outbursts and is in part based on deposition rates (soil metadata and tephrochronology).…”
Section: Interannual Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 39%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is similar to the FLEX-DUST estimate for dust emissions in Iceland in years 2010 through 2012 in global simulations (4.8 Tg; Groot Zwaaftink et al, 2016). Dust emission rates are an order of magnitude lower than previous estimates of dust emission rates (30.5 to 40.1 Tg annually) presented by Arnalds et al (2014). Their estimate includes dust spikes and redistribution in relation to volcanic events and glacial outbursts and is in part based on deposition rates (soil metadata and tephrochronology).…”
Section: Interannual Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Their estimate includes dust spikes and redistribution in relation to volcanic events and glacial outbursts and is in part based on deposition rates (soil metadata and tephrochronology). Also larger particles are included in estimates of Arnalds et al (2014), most of which would be deposited in the near vicinity of their sources. Other possible causes for this large difference are the large uncertainty related to extrapolation of visibility and storm frequency observations to dust concentration and emission estimates.…”
Section: Interannual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value is much lower than the mean deposition of 400 g m −2 years −1 suggested by Arnalds et al (2014). As the results of the Roof 2015 experiments show for both grain sizes that very small amounts (1-2 mm or smaller) of ash (or dust) deposition are enough to enhance melt, it is possible that the small amounts of dust or ash deposited on Vatnajökull have a comparable melt effect.…”
Section: −2mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This event lasted for about 12 h and the total flux from the source is estimated to be about 280,000 tonnes. Both events can thus be characterized as medium-sized (e.g., [22,37] The distance of the measurements from the dust sources was <100 km. The source material contains extremely fine particles.…”
Section: Dust Concentrations and Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%