2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-014-9943-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of I-123-meta-iodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratios: Not So Simple After All

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of these variations in collimators on the HMR is best illustrated by a Japanese multicenter phantom study [16]. In this study variations in the phantom identified an HMR of 1.6 for the same LE high-resolution (LEHR) collimators which ranged in measured values between 1.50 and 1.74 [26]. …”
Section: What Should Be Standardized?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of these variations in collimators on the HMR is best illustrated by a Japanese multicenter phantom study [16]. In this study variations in the phantom identified an HMR of 1.6 for the same LE high-resolution (LEHR) collimators which ranged in measured values between 1.50 and 1.74 [26]. …”
Section: What Should Be Standardized?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reviews have summarized the mechanism by which I-123 MIBG is taken up by the nerve terminal, the utility of this agent, and the technical aspects of its imaging. [24][25][26][27] One of the strengths of the current study by dos Santos 28 is that all of the subjects were relatively young (mean age of 16), when identification of early anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy would be most critical. The subjects were a median of 5.3 years out from their chemotherapy.…”
Section: See Related Article Pp 256-264mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this issue, it has been suggested that the H/M ratio threshold of 1.6 reported with the LEHR collimator should be converted to 2.0 for an institution in which the ME general-purpose collimator is used [33]. However, differences in the software used for analysis and variability in defining the regions of interest for mediastinum or heart may impact the result observed, especially in subjects with abnormal studies [34]. …”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%