2003
DOI: 10.1021/la0353071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Fluorine Density in the Outermost Atomic Layer

Abstract: The outermost atomic layer of perfluorinated thiol monolayers on gold and poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) is analyzed by low-energy ion scattering. Absolute quantification of fluorine density in this layer was achieved after calibrating the fluorine signal with a freshly cleaved LiF(100) single crystal. The fluorine density of monolayers of a C8F17-thiol on gold was 1.48 x 10(15) F atoms/cm2, whereas for PTFE a value of 1.24 x 1015 F atoms/cm2 was observed. This difference was explained by the different tilt … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Advancing water contact angles of MHDA-and PFDT-functionalized gold surfaces were found to be 748 6 38 and 1098 6 38, respectively. These are generally consistent with published values (van de Grampel et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2004), confirming that MHDA monolayers are hydrophilic and PFDT ones are hydrophobic. This difference in hydrophilicity permits selective adsorption of polymers and biomaterials through the methodology of patterning a gold surface with MHDA and ''backfilling'' the bare gold regions with PFDT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Advancing water contact angles of MHDA-and PFDT-functionalized gold surfaces were found to be 748 6 38 and 1098 6 38, respectively. These are generally consistent with published values (van de Grampel et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2004), confirming that MHDA monolayers are hydrophilic and PFDT ones are hydrophobic. This difference in hydrophilicity permits selective adsorption of polymers and biomaterials through the methodology of patterning a gold surface with MHDA and ''backfilling'' the bare gold regions with PFDT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The very large CAH is likely due to the fact that the fluorinated chain (e.g., C 8 F 17 ) is not long enough to prevent the surface reorganization (i.e., to shield the polar urethane group from the interrogating liquid) upon contact with water during the CA measurements:18 when the water droplet is in contact with the film surface, the urethane group that originally sits below the top fluoroalkyl layer would have the opportunity to interact with water, leading to a low θ R . We examined the top atomic layer of the fluorinated PU surface containing 1 wt.‐% of fluorine by low energy ion scattering,19,20 and found only fluorine and carbon atoms are present, suggesting that oxygen and nitrogen atoms are primarily located beneath the top atomic layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 As it was observed by XPS, the surface of the film annealed at 600°C is free from fluorine and a reduction of the surface wettability for the higher annealing temperatures should be expected since it is known that the fluorine surface concentration controls the surface energy. 43 However, the Raman results suggest the formation of larger graphitic domains for annealing temperatures higher than 300°C, and so, a more hydrophobic sur-face. In this way, the measured contact angles reflect the competition between these two opposite trends and only a slight increase was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%