2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(01)00545-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of ephedrines in urine by column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For NPEP a threshold of 5 g/mL and for EP and MEP a threshold of 10 g/mL is applied. In anti-doping analysis ephedrines used to be quantified in urine by GC-NPD, GC-MS or HPLC-UV after preconcentrating the sample by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [3][4][5] or after an online clean-up [6]. The sensitivity of liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and the compatibility of the system with the aqueous matrix of urine has allowed quantitative analysis of ephedrines without preconcentration step by direct injection [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For NPEP a threshold of 5 g/mL and for EP and MEP a threshold of 10 g/mL is applied. In anti-doping analysis ephedrines used to be quantified in urine by GC-NPD, GC-MS or HPLC-UV after preconcentrating the sample by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [3][4][5] or after an online clean-up [6]. The sensitivity of liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and the compatibility of the system with the aqueous matrix of urine has allowed quantitative analysis of ephedrines without preconcentration step by direct injection [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muitos métodos têm sido relatados na literatura científi ca para detecção de efedrina em extratos vegetais, suplementos alimentares e amostras biológicas, utilizando as técnicas de cromatografi a à líquido de alta efi ciência (JP XIII, 1996;Gurley et al, 1998;Gmeiner et al, 2002), cromatografi a à gas (Garcia et al, 2005;Marchei et al, 2006), eletroforese capilar (MateusAvois et al, 2003) e espectrometria de massas (Gay et al, 2001;Spyridaki et al, 2001;Tseng et al, 2003). Entretanto, a maioria destes métodos está relacionada à análise de efedrinas em urina ou suplementos alimentares, reportando extensas fases de preparação da amostra e não permitindo efi ciente separação de EF e PEF (Spyridaki et al, 2001;Tseng et al, 2003), o que é de extrema importância em se tratando de análises toxicológicas, dopagem e monitoramento terapêutico, uma vez que ambos isômeros apresentam diferentes atividades farmacológicas e ações sobre o SNC, considerando que metodologias envolvendo detector de massas são preferidas em alto grau para identifi cação de substâncias contidas em produtos de origem desconhecida, esta foi à metodologia escolhida para a realização deste trabalho.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…However, they are classified as prohibited substances according to the International Olympic Committee (IOC)'s list of prohibited classes of substances, due to their potency to stimulate the central nervous system 85 and the concentration limits of five ephedrine derivatives in urine have been established. 86 Furthermore, high doses of ephedrines are also responsible for some incidents of acute hepatitis and nephrolithiasis.…”
Section: ·1 Analysis Methods Of Ephedrinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It successfully resolved the problem of time-consuming sample clean-up step and made the automation possible. 85 In order to further enhance the sensitivity compared with that of a UV detector, Aymard presented a specific HPLC analysis method with fluorometric detection for quantification of ephedrine and norephedrine in human plasma after liquid-liquid extraction and derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate. 96 The satisfactory detection limits of 2 ng/mL for ephedrine and 5 ng/mL for norephedrine were obtained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%