2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of dye-mediated photodamage during single-molecule DNA imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To that end, we systematically tested three strategies for conjugating QDs to UV-DDB and proceeded with a His-Ab conjugation strategy that enabled us to conjugate UV-DDB to SA-QDs using a biotinylated pentaHis antibody, while retaining DNA damage binding activity (SI Materials and Methods, section 1.2.3) (29). We incubated QD UV-DDB with undamaged λ-DNA tightropes or λ-DNA containing on average one lesion per 2,200 bp (SI Materials and Methods, section 2) and observed these interactions in a time window of 900 s. Imaging was performed in the absence of YOYO-1 dye to minimize potential double-strand breaks in the DNA tightropes (SI Materials and Methods, section 1.2.4) (38). We observed the binding of UV-DDB to DNA ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, we systematically tested three strategies for conjugating QDs to UV-DDB and proceeded with a His-Ab conjugation strategy that enabled us to conjugate UV-DDB to SA-QDs using a biotinylated pentaHis antibody, while retaining DNA damage binding activity (SI Materials and Methods, section 1.2.3) (29). We incubated QD UV-DDB with undamaged λ-DNA tightropes or λ-DNA containing on average one lesion per 2,200 bp (SI Materials and Methods, section 2) and observed these interactions in a time window of 900 s. Imaging was performed in the absence of YOYO-1 dye to minimize potential double-strand breaks in the DNA tightropes (SI Materials and Methods, section 1.2.4) (38). We observed the binding of UV-DDB to DNA ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA photodamage depends linearly on the power used to excite fluorescent intercalators in its DNA-bound state (Tycon et al 2012) and consequently affects the total time a single DNA molecule can be imaged without degradation. We characterized the DNA photodamage dependence on laser power at fixed SYTOX green and YOYO-1 concentrations (40 nM) by measuring the cumulative probability of DNA breakage and the number of DNA molecules broken (1) to experimental data.…”
Section: Light-induced Dna Cleavage By Sytox Greenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, excitation of intercalating stain has been shown to induce DNA cleavage through freeradical formation (27). However, at the low intensity of 532-nm illumination required for excitation of the intercalating stain and photo-activation of Cy5 (0.49 W$cm À2 at 532 nm), no DNA degradation was detected for tens of minutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%