2008
DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2008/0170-0303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of diet variability in a stream amphipod: implications for ecosystem functioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gammarids likely increased consumption of the water moss, F. antipyretica, in the period when biomass of diatoms became insufficient to meet their food requirements. Thus, our data support the conclusion of Felten et al [7] that bryophytes can be a food item of amphipods, but specify that the importance of bryophytes increases in periods of shortcoming of the main foodstuff, i.e., diatoms. McWilliam-Hughes et al [30] also concluded that bryophytes might be an important alternate (marginal) food source for aquatic macroinvertebrates when a preferred food (e.g., diatoms) is scarce.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The gammarids likely increased consumption of the water moss, F. antipyretica, in the period when biomass of diatoms became insufficient to meet their food requirements. Thus, our data support the conclusion of Felten et al [7] that bryophytes can be a food item of amphipods, but specify that the importance of bryophytes increases in periods of shortcoming of the main foodstuff, i.e., diatoms. McWilliam-Hughes et al [30] also concluded that bryophytes might be an important alternate (marginal) food source for aquatic macroinvertebrates when a preferred food (e.g., diatoms) is scarce.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Many studies have reported the direct consumption of aquatic bryophytes, including F. antipyretica, by some taxa of benthic invertebrates [1, 6,13]. Among the zoobenthos, gammarids are known to be highly opportunistic feeders capable of predation, and can also collect detritus, scrape periphytic microalgae and leaf litter, and graze on aquatic macrophytes [7,[31][32][33]. Although gammarids, E. viridis, at the studied site evidently had a high degree of predation ( Figure 5) and thereby might get the acetylenic acids through their prey, we suggest that they consumed bryophyte particles directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the predatory impact of D. villosus is determined by local and seasonal conditions determining increasing allometric growth differences between both sexes, including temperature and food availability. Felten et al (2008b) carried out a study on the diet of G. fossarum in streams, which indicated its main role as collector and shredder. However, animal food was taken up by the larger specimens (6-8 mm) and was evident in submersed root and bryophyte but not in detrital pool habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They shred the material and, therefore, make it available for the decomposers and filterers in the stream system (Cummins and Klug, 1979). Thus, G. pulex accomplishes an important role by linking the energetic transport from the terrestrial to the aquatic system (Cummins and Klug, 1979;Graça et al, 2001;Felten et al, 2008a). At the same time, G. pulex may behave as a predator and as a cannibal (MacNeil et al, 1997;Kelly et al, 2002).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%