2008
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01298-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Diatom and Dinoflagellate Biomasses in Coastal Marine Seawater Samples by Real-Time PCR

Abstract: Two real-time PCR assays targeting the small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) were designed to assess the proportional biomass of diatoms and dinoflagellates in marine coastal water. The reverse primer for the diatom assay was designed to be class specific, and the dinoflagellate-specific reverse primer was obtained from the literature. For both targets, we used universal eukaryotic SSU rDNA forward primers. Specificity was confirmed by using a BLAST search and by amplification of cultures of various phytopl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
179
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
12
179
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ciliates, can also be fragile and tend to be either ignored or under sampled using standard Lugol's techniques (Lovejoy et al, 1993). Ciliate and dinoflagellate dominance in 18S rRNA gene libraries has also been attributed to their comparatively larger genomes and multiple copies of the rRNA gene (Godhe et al, 2008). Irrespective of the actual cell abundance, our analysis clearly revealed otherwise undetected changes in species over seasons (Supplementary Tables 4 and 5).…”
Section: Environmental Influences On Microzooplanktonmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Ciliates, can also be fragile and tend to be either ignored or under sampled using standard Lugol's techniques (Lovejoy et al, 1993). Ciliate and dinoflagellate dominance in 18S rRNA gene libraries has also been attributed to their comparatively larger genomes and multiple copies of the rRNA gene (Godhe et al, 2008). Irrespective of the actual cell abundance, our analysis clearly revealed otherwise undetected changes in species over seasons (Supplementary Tables 4 and 5).…”
Section: Environmental Influences On Microzooplanktonmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Interestingly, both Pearson and Spearman rank correlations were typically strongest for the nuclear 18S rDNA marker. Many studies have shown strong correlations between biovolume and 18S copy number for a range of eukaryotic taxa, including metazoans (Godhe et al., 2008; de Vargas et al., 2015; Zhu, Massana, Not, Marie, & Vaulot, 2005). Several factors could reduce the strength of the correlation between biomass and HTS reads in this study, including using separate samples for DNA‐based and morphology‐based identification, and estimating biomass using conversion factors rather than direct measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evans et al (2007) [54] assessed the effectiveness of several genes (cox1, rbcL, 18S and ITS rDNA) to distinguish cryptic species within the model "morphospecies", Sellaphora pupula agg., and found that tree topologies were very similar although support values were generally lower for cox1. To assess the proportional biomass of diatoms and dinoflagellates along the Swedish west marine coast, Godhe et al (2008) [27] designed two real-time PCR assays with special primers to find that the linear regression of the proportion of SSU rDNA copies of dinoflagellate and diatom origin versus the proportion of dinoflagellate and diatom biovolumes or biomass per liter was significant. Thus, for diatoms, linear regression of the number of small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) copies versus biovolume or biomass per liter was significant, but no such significant correlation was detected in the field samples for dinoflagellates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is faster in terms of sampling processing, and may become cheaper as the technology improves, and more importantly with the ability to provide more reliable and richer biological information than the traditional morphology-based method [22][23][24]. Different plankton assemblages as bioindicators were characterized using DNA sequencing including bacterioplankton [18,[24][25][26], and phytoplankton [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Baird and Hajibabaei (2012) [17] envisioned a new paradigm (i.e., Biomonitoring 2.0) in ecosystem assessment based on a HTS platform, though a complete paradigm shift may require more research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%