2022
DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.122.009116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Device-Related Event Reports Associated With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific parameters measured in the study require implantation of minimally invasive devices, however, a more limited data set may be monitored using wrist worn or non-invasive technology. Both approaches have benefits and limitations: the implantation of minimally invasive devices is associated with a limited risk 30 and cost, however provides a secure reliable data collection and transfer system; wrist worn technology can provide an assessment of heart rate, heart rate variability, physical activity and derived measures, however, data collection is not secure and there are limitations with accurate heart rate/variability detection exacerbated by motion artifact, skin pigmentation and poor peripheral perfusion. 31 The most appropriate technology for the monitoring of patients with PH remains to be determined, however, a hierarchy of non-invasive, minimally invasive, and invasive technology may be appropriate when also considering patient preference, technological availability and access, and disease severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific parameters measured in the study require implantation of minimally invasive devices, however, a more limited data set may be monitored using wrist worn or non-invasive technology. Both approaches have benefits and limitations: the implantation of minimally invasive devices is associated with a limited risk 30 and cost, however provides a secure reliable data collection and transfer system; wrist worn technology can provide an assessment of heart rate, heart rate variability, physical activity and derived measures, however, data collection is not secure and there are limitations with accurate heart rate/variability detection exacerbated by motion artifact, skin pigmentation and poor peripheral perfusion. 31 The most appropriate technology for the monitoring of patients with PH remains to be determined, however, a hierarchy of non-invasive, minimally invasive, and invasive technology may be appropriate when also considering patient preference, technological availability and access, and disease severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MEMS‐HF study, one patient experienced a serious infection related to the device, and there were a small number of patients who experienced serious implant procedure‐related events, including infection, hemoptysis, bleeding, abnormal heart rate/rhythm, renal failure, and lead dislodgement/migration 32 . In an analysis of data from the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database, from a total of 2861 reports, hemoptysis was reported in 70 cases (2.4%), heart failure exacerbation in 43 cases (1.5%), and significant bleeding at the catheterization site in 24 cases (0.8%) 33 . CardioMEMS was associated with death or comfort care (undefined) in 167 (5.8%) of the reports.…”
Section: The Importance Of Hemodynamic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 32 In an analysis of data from the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database, from a total of 2861 reports, hemoptysis was reported in 70 cases (2.4%), heart failure exacerbation in 43 cases (1.5%), and significant bleeding at the catheterization site in 24 cases (0.8%). 33 CardioMEMS was associated with death or comfort care (undefined) in 167 (5.8%) of the reports.…”
Section: The Importance Of Hemodynamic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%