2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of dental erosion—A comparison of stylus profilometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
62
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a different situation was noticed when the solution was stirred for homogenization prior to the acquisition of a new image (d). In the beginning of this experiment the current is similar to the one obtained in the bulk solution, but its decay is very fast probably because of the removal of the chemical resistant enamel outer layer [6,23]. A final experiment (image not shown) was carried out using an acetate buffer solution of the same pH = 3.4.…”
Section: Secm Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, a different situation was noticed when the solution was stirred for homogenization prior to the acquisition of a new image (d). In the beginning of this experiment the current is similar to the one obtained in the bulk solution, but its decay is very fast probably because of the removal of the chemical resistant enamel outer layer [6,23]. A final experiment (image not shown) was carried out using an acetate buffer solution of the same pH = 3.4.…”
Section: Secm Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the microelectrode surface was rinsed with water and sonicated for 5 minutes in distilled water. The radius of the microelectrode was determined by measuring the steady-state current in a 10 mmol L −1 K 3 Fe(CN) 6 solution containing 0.1 mol L −1 KCl as supporting electrolyte [17].…”
Section: Microelectrode Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Citric acid has been applied in many erosion studies using different concentrations and different experimental set-ups with various analytical methods used for measuring the erosive effect [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%