Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(00)00661-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of creep strain distribution in small crept lead-free in-situ composite and non composite solder joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of the deformation could be investigated much better than in previous work. 21,22 No influence of the method developed in this study on the creep and fracturing behavior could be observed.…”
Section: Local Creepmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The details of the deformation could be investigated much better than in previous work. 21,22 No influence of the method developed in this study on the creep and fracturing behavior could be observed.…”
Section: Local Creepmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…4 The creep properties of SnAgCu solder joints have been studied to some extent. [5][6][7][8] However, detailed information of the effect of microstructure on the creep properties, and especially on the failure mechanism during creep, has been scarce. Studies of failure mechanisms in other kinds of tests, like pull or shear tests, have shown that the failure mechanism is strongly dependent on the test method, the geometry of the solder joint, and the temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Reinforcing the solder matrix with a small volume fraction of second phase reinforcement particles (such as Cu/Cu 6 Sn 5 /Cu 3 Sn, Ni/ Ni 3 Sn 4 , Fe/FeSn/FeSn 2 , or Ni-coated graphite) has been found to enhance strength, as well as creep and fatigue resistance, [9][10][11][12] particularly under stresscontrolled fatigue, 9 and low strain-rate TMC conditions. 11,12 However, in microelectronic applications, TMC is strain-controlled, and under these conditions, hard/stiff reinforcements appear to decrease fatigue life and creep resistance by promoting void nucleation at the particle-matrix interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%