2009
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of chemical–polymer surface interactions in microfluidic cell culture devices

Abstract: Microfluidic cell culture devices have been used for drug development, chemical analysis, and environmental pollutant detection. Because of the decreased fluid volume and increased surface area to volume ratio, interactions between device surfaces and the fluid is a key element that affects the performance and detection accuracy of microfluidic devices, particularly if fluid is recirculated by a peristaltic pump. However, this issue has not been studied in detail in a microfluidic cell culture environment. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tradeoffs in microscale systems include drug adsorption and complex operation, and other approaches are continuously being developed to address specific assays such as low clearance compounds and reactive metabolites [93]. Thus, the advantages of microfluidic systems may be greater for more complex applications that require microscale 3D architectures to retain function, or applications where interconnection with other microscale organ mimics provides greatly enhanced information [9496]. …”
Section: Bioreactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tradeoffs in microscale systems include drug adsorption and complex operation, and other approaches are continuously being developed to address specific assays such as low clearance compounds and reactive metabolites [93]. Thus, the advantages of microfluidic systems may be greater for more complex applications that require microscale 3D architectures to retain function, or applications where interconnection with other microscale organ mimics provides greatly enhanced information [9496]. …”
Section: Bioreactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDMS is the same material used to deliver the steroid hormones in the implantable drug delivery system Norplant, in which the steroid hormones diffuse through a PDMS barrier in which they are highly soluble compared to their solubility in saline. The drawbacks of working with PDMS when quantitative control of highly lipophilic compounds is needed have been described by several labs, and though the problem can be partially and temporarily mitigated by various surface treatments, the PDMS molecules are highly mobile and the surface rearranges over time [63,187189]. Other elastomers suitable for microfluidics are now being explored, but no prominent solution has emerged for widespread use, in part as the properties that allow elastomers to work well in microfabrication overlap with those that foster drug partitioning to some degree.…”
Section: Opportunities and Challenges For Use Of Bioreactors In Drmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tight seal between the housing, the silicon chip and tubing connections is essential while cells can be damaged by device assembly. Chemical cross contamination is another potential problem when housing pieces are reused, as plastic is prone to hydrophobic chemical surface adsorption (Xu and Shuler 2009). As an alternative, disposable PDMS microCCA devices are lower in material cost, less expensive to fabricate, easier to seal by plasma and need no extra housing pieces.…”
Section: Construction Of Microcca Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prototype devices reviewed here were operated with relatively large equipment such as incubators, syringe pumps, or peristaltic pumps. Peristaltic pumps often are operated with flexible polymer tubing that can absorb compounds (especially hydrophobic ones), leading to significant chemical loss when the fluid is recirculated (95). Possible solutions to this problem include the development of nonabsorbent tubing (96), on-chip micropumps (97), or pumpless systems such as that developed by Sung et al (93).…”
Section: Increasing the Potential Impact Of Microfluidic In Vitro Sysmentioning
confidence: 99%