Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has been a popular surgical option for obstructive hydrocephalus (OHCP) in recent decades. [1][2][3] A number of studies worldwide have reported favorable outcomes; 4-6 however, in some cases, ETV fails to resolve symptoms, even when it is technically successful with adequate patent stoma and fenestrated Lillequist membrane. [7][8][9][10][11] It has been hypothesized that patients might suffer from hydrocephalus caused by other obstructive membranes or by fibrosis in the subarachnoid space, especially around basal cisterns. Cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC MR) has been utilized as a method of distinguishing between ABSTRACT: Background: To predict success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in patients with obstructive hydrocephalus, we evaluated pre-and post-operative phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance images (PC MRI) on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cine flow in basal cisterns around the brain stem, and cervical medullar junction (CMJ) retrospectively. Methods: The study involved 102 patients with mean age of 36.74±23.25, and F/M = 1.55. All patients had PC MRI taken both pre-and post-operatively. A dynamic MRI video of PC MRI was reviewed at sagittal, axial, and coronal sections to determine cistern flows around the brain stem and CMJ. For quantitative analysis, quadrants were divided around midbrain axially to evaluate interpeduncular, quadrageminal, and ambient cisterns of both sides using scores of 0 to 60. Pre-and post-pontine and CMJ flows were shown in sagittal view and scored 0 to 20, and lateral cerebellopontine cisterns of both sides were measured on coronal image and scored 0 to 20. Results: No significant difference in CSF flow was seen from three individual views and total cine score, or between ETV success and failure groups by multivariate analysis of variance. Kaplan-Meier Analysis and Spearman's Correlation Test produced no relationship between MRI cine flow scores and interval period after surgery to ETV failure. Conclusion: PC MRI cine flow failed to demonstrate significant differences between successful and failed ETV groups. This indicates in addition to achieving an adequate fenestration, CSF pathways beyond the basal cisterns around the brain stem and CMJ may play an essential role in achieving ETV success. Aucune différence significative du flux du LCR n'a été observée sur trois clichés individuels et l'analyse de variance multivariée n'a décelé aucune différence significative du score ciné total ou entre les groupes dont la VET a été un succès ou un échec. Le test de Kaplan-Meier et le test de corrélation de Spearman n'ont pas montré de relation entre les scores du flux au ciné IRM et l'intervalle entre la chirurgie ou entre les scores et l'échec de la VET. Conclusion : Le ciné IRM CP du flux n'a pas montré de différence significative entre le groupe dont la VET a été un succès et le groupe dont la VET a été un échec. Ceci indique qu'en plus de réussir à établir une fenestration adéquate, les voies du LCR au-delà des citer...