2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12265-023-10357-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Cardiomyocyte Contraction In Vitro and Drug Screening by MyocytoBeats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundamentally, this challenge is driven by multiple factors, ranging from the high volume of data collected with these testbeds [ 29 ], to challenges associated with reproducing results when software and data are not shared under open-source licenses, or when extracting quantities of interest from data requires significant manual processing. To date, there have been multiple non-destructive image-based methods for quantifying the contractile action of cardiac microbundles [ 21 , 30 39 ], often inspired by related approaches to assessing the contractile behavior of cardiomyocytes [ 30 , 40 50 ]. Broadly speaking, most of these tools can be grouped into four main categories: (1) edge detection systems [ 31 , 32 ], (2) pillar tracking-based methods [ 33 37 , 39 ], (3) inter-frame pixel disparity methods [ 21 , 38 ], and (4) optical flow-based tracking [ 30 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, this challenge is driven by multiple factors, ranging from the high volume of data collected with these testbeds [ 29 ], to challenges associated with reproducing results when software and data are not shared under open-source licenses, or when extracting quantities of interest from data requires significant manual processing. To date, there have been multiple non-destructive image-based methods for quantifying the contractile action of cardiac microbundles [ 21 , 30 39 ], often inspired by related approaches to assessing the contractile behavior of cardiomyocytes [ 30 , 40 50 ]. Broadly speaking, most of these tools can be grouped into four main categories: (1) edge detection systems [ 31 , 32 ], (2) pillar tracking-based methods [ 33 37 , 39 ], (3) inter-frame pixel disparity methods [ 21 , 38 ], and (4) optical flow-based tracking [ 30 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%