2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-014-0379-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of carbon stock to understand two different forest management regimes in Kayar Khola watershed, Chitwan, Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We randomly sampled three soil profiles in each 30 m × 30 m plot. The soil layers were grouped into six depth intervals: 5 (0-10), 15 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), 25 (20-30), 40 (30-50), 60 , and 85 (70-100) cm. First, each layer of the soil samples was sealed in plastic bags, brought back to the laboratory, air-dried, and sieved through a 0.15 mm mesh before performing the chemical analyses.…”
Section: Sampling and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We randomly sampled three soil profiles in each 30 m × 30 m plot. The soil layers were grouped into six depth intervals: 5 (0-10), 15 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), 25 (20-30), 40 (30-50), 60 , and 85 (70-100) cm. First, each layer of the soil samples was sealed in plastic bags, brought back to the laboratory, air-dried, and sieved through a 0.15 mm mesh before performing the chemical analyses.…”
Section: Sampling and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinus massoniana BA = 0.0245(D 2 H) 1.0209 , R 2 = 0.97; BR = 0.0126(D 2 H) 0.9024 , R 2 = 0.97 [43] Cunninghamia lanceolata BA = 0.093(D 2 H) 0.8030 , R 2 = 0.98; BR = 0.0073D 2.3125 , R 2 = 0.99 [42] Eucalyptus urophylla BA = 0.1691(D 2 H) 0.7472 , R 2 = 0.95; BR = 0.1723(D 2 H) 0.5630 , R 2 = 0.90 [43] Phyllostachys heterocycla BA = 0.6439D 1.5373 , R 2 = 0.91; BR1 = 0.3404D 1.1899 , R 2 = 0.97, BR2 = 0.3087D 1.2892 , R 2 = 0.80, BR = BR1 + BR2, [41] Cryptocarya We randomly sampled three soil profiles in each 30 m × 30 m plot. The soil layers were grouped into six depth intervals: 5 (0-10), 15 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), 25 (20-30), 40 (30-50), 60 , and 85 (70-100) cm. First, each layer of the soil samples was sealed in plastic bags, brought back to the laboratory, airdried, and sieved through a 0.15 mm mesh before performing the chemical analyses.…”
Section: Tree Species Regression Equation (B 1 D 2 H 3 ) and The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil samples for SOC contents (%) determination were taken from the soil profile at six depth levels: 5 (0-10), 15 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), 25 (20-30), 40 (30-50), 60 , and 85 (70-100) cm. The SBF had the highest SOC content (3.37%) at 5 cm depth out of all measured forest types (Figure 5a).…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations