2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of carbon sequestration by urban forest using Landsat 8 OLI and machine learning algorithms in Jodhpur, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomass and carbon stocks are crucial quantitative aspects of forest ecology. The average aboveground biomass in this study was comparably higher than the other studies, For example, reported values are 9.58 ton/ha in Tripura University Campus, Northeast (Deb et al, 2016), 79.125 ton/ha in an urban forest, Jodhpur city, Rajsthan (Uniyal et al, 2022), 64.92 ton/ha in an soil organic carbon stock, in urban green site foothill was 50.82 ton/ha (Pradhan et al, 2022), in main land use of Allada plateau, Southern Benin, West Africa, it was 83 ton/ha (Houssoukpevi et al, 2022), and the value of soil organic carbon stock in an urban park under cold climate conditions, Finland was 104 ton/ha (Linden et al, 2020) (Table 7).…”
Section: Carbon Stocksupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Biomass and carbon stocks are crucial quantitative aspects of forest ecology. The average aboveground biomass in this study was comparably higher than the other studies, For example, reported values are 9.58 ton/ha in Tripura University Campus, Northeast (Deb et al, 2016), 79.125 ton/ha in an urban forest, Jodhpur city, Rajsthan (Uniyal et al, 2022), 64.92 ton/ha in an soil organic carbon stock, in urban green site foothill was 50.82 ton/ha (Pradhan et al, 2022), in main land use of Allada plateau, Southern Benin, West Africa, it was 83 ton/ha (Houssoukpevi et al, 2022), and the value of soil organic carbon stock in an urban park under cold climate conditions, Finland was 104 ton/ha (Linden et al, 2020) (Table 7).…”
Section: Carbon Stocksupporting
confidence: 45%
“…In three algorithms, the accuracy of ERT algorithm is significantly better than that of RF, indicating the importance of ERT in the estimation of surface parameters, especially the forest biomass. XGBoost is also showed excellent performance in the AGB model in other studies [24]. From the perspective of R² and RMSE, the best model of the XGBoost with all variables performed the best.…”
Section: Feature Importance In Agb Modelingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A UV apresentou forte dependência na profundidade de 20-40 cm, enquanto, a DS apresentou forte dependência na profundidade de 0-20cm e moderada dependência na profundidade de 20-40 cm. Araújo et al (2014) Tanto a área de Mata Nativa quanto a área de Pousio apresentaram valores baixos de RMSE e MAE, indicando melhor desempenho de estimativa do modelo de semivariograma escolhido (Uniyal, et al, 2021). Em relação ao índice de concordância de Willmott, foram observados altos valores tanto nos atributos estudados na área de Mata Nativa quanto na área de Pousio, indicando boa concordância dos valores obtidos (Santana, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified