2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of border effect on grain yield measurement of hybrid rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Edge-biased crop development has been observed and reported for almost 100 years in winter wheat fields, where wheat rows along the borders showed higher yields than those in the center (Arny 1922). Over the years, rice (Wang et al 2013), maize and climbing beans (Davis et al 2008;Tiegu et al 2012), wheat (Wu and Li 2002;Bulinski and Niemczyk 2015), millets, Sudan grass (Drapala and Johnson 1961), soybean (Teng et al 2008), cotton (Luckett et al 1992), rapeseed (Buliński and Niemczyk 2010), carrots, cabbages, and onions (Peach et al 2000) have been shown to display edge-biased distribution of growth. In rice, the increase in yield of border rows compared to central portions of fields or plots ranged from 63 to 68% (Bulinski and Niemczyk 2015).…”
Section: Plant Qualitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Edge-biased crop development has been observed and reported for almost 100 years in winter wheat fields, where wheat rows along the borders showed higher yields than those in the center (Arny 1922). Over the years, rice (Wang et al 2013), maize and climbing beans (Davis et al 2008;Tiegu et al 2012), wheat (Wu and Li 2002;Bulinski and Niemczyk 2015), millets, Sudan grass (Drapala and Johnson 1961), soybean (Teng et al 2008), cotton (Luckett et al 1992), rapeseed (Buliński and Niemczyk 2010), carrots, cabbages, and onions (Peach et al 2000) have been shown to display edge-biased distribution of growth. In rice, the increase in yield of border rows compared to central portions of fields or plots ranged from 63 to 68% (Bulinski and Niemczyk 2015).…”
Section: Plant Qualitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The major factors accounting for such edge-biased growth difference have been attributed to competition for nutrients and light among crop plants (Peach et al 2000). The body of research documenting edge-biased distributions of crop development often regards the phenomenon as undesirable and seeks ways to curb the effect to avoid overestimation in yield calculations (Wang et al 2013;Miller and Mountier 1955;Arny 1922). However, from an entomological perspective, the research focus would be to study how withinfield vegetational heterogeneity contributes to the edge-biased distribution of insects in agricultural systems.…”
Section: Plant Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the outermost row of plants had significantly higher yields than the inner plants owing to advantageous environmental factors such as more solar energy, good ventilation and less competition for nutrients. This phenomenon has been reported in rice and other crops Gomez and De Datta, 1971;Austin and Blackwell, 1980;Sato and Takahashi, 1983;Wang et al, 2013 , and the amount of yield difference due to the border effect depends on the crop variety, planting density, and field size and shape e.g. Kim and Yang, 1984;Wang et al, 2013 . With regard to plant heights, previous studies have revealed that the border effect is not very pronounced, even when yield increases are high.…”
Section: The Border Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This phenomenon has been reported in rice and other crops Gomez and De Datta, 1971;Austin and Blackwell, 1980;Sato and Takahashi, 1983;Wang et al, 2013 , and the amount of yield difference due to the border effect depends on the crop variety, planting density, and field size and shape e.g. Kim and Yang, 1984;Wang et al, 2013 . With regard to plant heights, previous studies have revealed that the border effect is not very pronounced, even when yield increases are high. For example, Sato and Takahashi 1983 stated that in a rice field with a planting density of 11 plants per m 2 , the plant heights in the outermost row were 97 to 99 of those in the inner row, though the relative percentages for aboveground biomass were 129 to 177 .…”
Section: The Border Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The border effect expressed by various treatments shows that (Table 4) it ranges from 21.9 to 69.6 %. Border effect to the tune of 62to 142% in hybrid rice was reported by Wang et al (2013).…”
Section: Border Effect Of Different Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%