2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of angiogenesis by the Chalkley method and its prognostic significance in epithelial ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly highly vascular tumours showed a better PFS; this result has been shown previously 12. Nevertheless, an inverse relation between vascularity and response to chemotherapy has been described 19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surprisingly highly vascular tumours showed a better PFS; this result has been shown previously 12. Nevertheless, an inverse relation between vascularity and response to chemotherapy has been described 19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Reasons for this may be, in addition to inhomogenous groups of patients, different methods of assessing vascular density. The Chalkley assay we used has been suggested as a standard method for angiogenesis quantification in solid tumour sections17 and it has been shown to be reliable in ovarian cancer 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vascular density was assessed using an antibody against anti-CD34, which is a single-chain transmembrane glycoprotein, associated with human hematopoietic progenitor cells. We used 30 cases of human serous ovarian carcinoma (15 responders and 15 nonresponders) and 28 cases of mice xenograft tumors [14 cases from SKOV-3 and 14 cases from MDAH-2774 (7 cases transduced with miR-484 and 7 cases transduced with EGFP)] and evaluated using the Chalkley eyepiece method (17). In human tumors, the mean microvessel density was 30 ± 1.17 (range = 9-54) for responders and 68 ± 1.6 (range = 15-114) for nonresponders (P = 0.0000002); in mice, it was 9 ± 5.5 (range = 1-18) for SKOV-3-miR-484, 23 ± 12 (range = 5-37) for SKOV-3-EGFP (P = 0.0004), 10 ± 6.2 (range = 4-22) for MDAH-2774-miR-484, and 17 ± 8.9 (range = 5-28) for MDAH-2774-EGFP (P = 0.0009) (Fig.…”
Section: Results Mir Expression In Serous Ovarianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that high angiogenesis measured by the Chalkey method predicts poor overall survival in the whole study group and in the advanced stage ovarian cancers. Researchers suggested that, in order to define the clinical significance of this finding in more detail, further studies on other patient materials and perhaps comparison with other evaluation methods of angiogenesis in ovarian cancer should be conducted [50]. …”
Section: The Concepts Of the Automated Cancer Diagnosis And The Assesmentioning
confidence: 99%