The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.07.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of allergenic plant traces in baked products by targeted proteomics using isotope marked peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three peptides (8–18 amino acids) for each legume species were finally chosen as peptide markers from the group of the candidate marker peptides due to their highest intensities in spiked sausages (test sausage T4, see Table 1 ) applying the optimized MRM method (see Section 3.2 .). The final selected peptides QQEQQLEGELEK [ 25 ], NTLEATFNTR [ 25 , 31 ], and ISSVNSLTLPILR [ 25 ] for lupine blue, NPYHFSSQR [ 31 ] for lupine white, ELTFPGSVQEINR, LSSGDVFVIPAGHPVAVK, and LTPGDVFVIPAGHPVAVR for pea [ 25 ], GTGNLELVAVR [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], FNLAGNHEQEFLR [ 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 ], and WLGLSAEYGNLYR [ 32 , 34 ] for peanut, and SQSDNFEYVSFK [ 23 , 34 , 36 ], EAFGVNMQIVR [ 25 , 34 , 38 , 39 ], and FYLAGNQEQEFLK [ 22 , 23 , 25 , 36 ] for soy have been reported previously in the scientific literature. The identities of each of the 14 marker peptides for alfalfa, broad bean, chickpea, and lentil, as well as lupine white 2 and 3, which have not been reported in the literature until now, were confirmed by spiking in a tryptic digest of an emulsion-type sausage (test sausage T4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three peptides (8–18 amino acids) for each legume species were finally chosen as peptide markers from the group of the candidate marker peptides due to their highest intensities in spiked sausages (test sausage T4, see Table 1 ) applying the optimized MRM method (see Section 3.2 .). The final selected peptides QQEQQLEGELEK [ 25 ], NTLEATFNTR [ 25 , 31 ], and ISSVNSLTLPILR [ 25 ] for lupine blue, NPYHFSSQR [ 31 ] for lupine white, ELTFPGSVQEINR, LSSGDVFVIPAGHPVAVK, and LTPGDVFVIPAGHPVAVR for pea [ 25 ], GTGNLELVAVR [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], FNLAGNHEQEFLR [ 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 ], and WLGLSAEYGNLYR [ 32 , 34 ] for peanut, and SQSDNFEYVSFK [ 23 , 34 , 36 ], EAFGVNMQIVR [ 25 , 34 , 38 , 39 ], and FYLAGNQEQEFLK [ 22 , 23 , 25 , 36 ] for soy have been reported previously in the scientific literature. The identities of each of the 14 marker peptides for alfalfa, broad bean, chickpea, and lentil, as well as lupine white 2 and 3, which have not been reported in the literature until now, were confirmed by spiking in a tryptic digest of an emulsion-type sausage (test sausage T4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method reached a sensitivity down to 2.0 mg/kg of lupine protein in sausages using a peptide marker for β‐conglutin from L. angustifolius , being comparable to those of PCR or ELISA, which ranged between 1 mg/kg (Holden et al., 2005; Holden et al., 2007; Kaw et al., 2008) and 10 mg/kg (Ecker, Ertl, Pulverer, et al., 2013; Waiblinger, Boernsen, Naumann, & Koeppel, 2014). Similarly, other works using HPLC–MS/MS and UPLC–MS/MS reported sensitivities between 0.05 and 24.0 mg/kg in pasta, cookies, and beverages (Huschek, Bonick, Lowenstein, Sievers, & Rawel, 2016; Locati, Morandi, Zanotti, & Arnoldi, 2006; Mane, Bringans, Johnson, Pareek, & Utikar, 2017; Mattarozzi, Bignardi, Elviri, & Careri, 2012; Resta, Brambilla, & Arnoldi, 2012). It is also important to highlight that MS‐based methods go beyond the detection/quantification of lupine, allowing to further confirm its species identity, representing an additional advantage over the immunoassays.…”
Section: Analytical Methods For Lupine Detection In Foodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, it was deduced that Sui p 2 is a thermostable protein. Hence, these deduced conformational epitopes will be preserved even if it is exposed in the harsh environment outside the source organism (Vanga et al, 2018;Huschek et al, 2016;Pfeifer et al, 2015). Also, it was reported that subjecting a thermostable allergen to heat treatment can increase its IgE binding affinity due to the slight change in its conformation, which grants better accessibility to otherwise hidden epitopes (Pfeifer et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%