2013
DOI: 10.7755/fb.111.1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification and reduction of unobserved mortality rates for snow, southern Tanner, and red king crabs (Chionoecetes opilio, C. bairdi, and Paralithodes camtschaticus) after encounters with trawls on the seafloor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advantages of the RAMP approach have made it an increasingly utilized methodology. It has successfully been used on a variety of species, including fishes (Barkley and Cadrin, 2012;Brownscombe et al, 2013;Davis, 2007;Davis and Ottmar, 2006;Humborstad et al, 2009;Raby et al, 2011) and invertebrates (Chilton et al, 2011;Hammond et al, 2013;Rose et al, 2013;Stoner et al, 2008;Stoner, 2012b) In addition to estimating bycatch mortality rates, RAMP can be used as a tool for the development, modification, and evaluation of fishing gear and techniques to mitigate incidental effects of fishing (conservation engineering) through quantifying bycatch mortality rates Rose et al, 2013).…”
Section: Reflex Action Mortality Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Advantages of the RAMP approach have made it an increasingly utilized methodology. It has successfully been used on a variety of species, including fishes (Barkley and Cadrin, 2012;Brownscombe et al, 2013;Davis, 2007;Davis and Ottmar, 2006;Humborstad et al, 2009;Raby et al, 2011) and invertebrates (Chilton et al, 2011;Hammond et al, 2013;Rose et al, 2013;Stoner et al, 2008;Stoner, 2012b) In addition to estimating bycatch mortality rates, RAMP can be used as a tool for the development, modification, and evaluation of fishing gear and techniques to mitigate incidental effects of fishing (conservation engineering) through quantifying bycatch mortality rates Rose et al, 2013).…”
Section: Reflex Action Mortality Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research study was completed using RAMP to compare mortality rates for unobserved Tanner and snow crab bycatch in the Bering Sea with different trawl gear configurations. Rates were determined by applying RAMP methodology to crab that had encountered a trawl, and subsequently were captured in an auxiliary net behind the trawl immediately after passing under trawl groundgear and then brought on deck for assessment Rose et al, 2013). Assessments from crabs captured with the auxiliary nets, but with no groundgear exposure, were used to account for effects of capture and handling.…”
Section: Case Study: Discarded Tanner Crabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality rates could be overestimated because of agonistic interactions or predation among captive animals, suboptimal temperature or water quality, density of animals in holding enclosures, or failure to meet other biological or environmental requirements of the captive animal (Simonson and Hochberg, 1986;Kondzela and Shirley, 1993;Wassenberg and Hill, 1993;Spanoghe and Bourne, 1997;Portz et al, 2006;Weltersbach and Strehlow, 2013). Alternatively, mortality rates could be underestimated because mortality resulting from an animal's inability to obtain food or avoid predation is not incorporated in such studies (Durkin et al, 1984;Uhlmann et al, 2009;Benoît et al, 2010;Urban, 2015).…”
Section: A Comparison Of Laboratory-holding and Tagreturn Methods Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite limitations of captive holding, RAMP relationships have commonly been created by using onboard holding tanks or laboratory-based holding facilities (Davis, 2007;Stoner et al, 2008;Humborstad et al, 2009;Barkley and Cadrin, 2012;Stoner, 2012;Hammond et al, 2013;Rose et al, 2013;Depestele et al 2 ;McArley and Herbert, 2014;Humborstad et al, 2016). Preference for this approach is largely due to advantages over alternative methods, which include providing scientists with control and allowing them to differentiate causes of mortality, observing degradation in health and changes in behavior, and knowing the time of death (Davis and Ryer 3 ).…”
Section: A Comparison Of Laboratory-holding and Tagreturn Methods Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent underwater video camera observations of snow crab encountering the traditional footgear (i.e., rockhopper) of a shrimp trawl demonstrated that snow crab are quickly overtaken by the trawl, with approximately 54% of individuals observed experiencing an encounter with the footgear (Nguyen et al 2014). Rose et al (2013) demonstrated that the mortality of decapod crabs in response to such encounters with trawl footgear can range from 10% to 31% depending on the species and region of the footgear they encounter. Subsequent work by Hammond et al (2013) showed that simple modifications to trawl footgear (i.e., rubber disk footgear with off-bottom sweeps or bridles) achieved a 36% and 50% reduction in mortality levels for Tanner crab (Chionoecetes bairdi) and snow crab (C. opilio), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%