2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification and prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity in the high porosity regime during laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the models, the number of detected pores was lower than expected compared with the Archimedes in Table 4. Similar findings were reported by Promoppatum et al [28] in their study on pore detection using Micro-CT. The limited detection of pores was attributed to the detection capability of the Micro-CT which depended on the voxel size determined by the size of the specimen and the capacity of the machine.…”
Section: Density and Pore Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…From the models, the number of detected pores was lower than expected compared with the Archimedes in Table 4. Similar findings were reported by Promoppatum et al [28] in their study on pore detection using Micro-CT. The limited detection of pores was attributed to the detection capability of the Micro-CT which depended on the voxel size determined by the size of the specimen and the capacity of the machine.…”
Section: Density and Pore Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The micrograph method, as described by Promoppatumet al. [21]. (2021) was applied to determine the mean LOF and melt pool dimensions, and the final volume of LOFs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The powder material properties are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 Material properties: thermal conductivity [19] and heat capacity [20] (a); density and viscosity [19] (b); heat transfer coefficient [19] and CTE [21] (c).
…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though AM is a promising manufacturing technology, it is facing numerous challenges in printed part qualification and certification in aerospace, automotive, and biomedical engineering applications. Inherent process variabilities and uncertainties in processing parameters (e.g., laser scan speed, power, and spot diameter) lead to numerous manufacturing defects such as cracking 6 , porosity 7,8 , roughness 9,10 , balling 11 , inclusion 12 , and bead-up 13 . Combined efforts from academia, industry, and government organizations sought to fully realize the potential of AM technology through a better understanding of the process-structure-performance of the AM materials systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%