2010
DOI: 10.1071/fp09118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification and modelling of the stomatal, cuticular and crack components of peach fruit surface conductance

Abstract: This study describes the components of fruit surface conductance. It aims to revise a modelling framework examining water loss across the fruit epidermis in relation to time and fruit growing conditions. For this purpose, cuticular crack surface area, healing artificial wounds in vivo, stomatal number and total fruit surface conductance were quantified during nectarine (Prunus persica L. nucipersica) fruit growth under contrasted irrigation regimes or thinning intensities. The contribution of stomatal componen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from Lescourret et al (1998) and Gibert et al (2005Gibert et al ( , 2010 S 59.22 Lescourret and Génard (2005) Reserve mobilisation Rm ls Leafy shoot and fine roots mobile fraction of reserves -Dimensionless 0.026 Lescourret and Génard (2005) Rm ow Old wood, coarse root and 1-year-old stem wood mobile fraction of reserves -Dimensionless 0.02 Moing and Gaudillère (1992), Ashworth et al (1993), Spann et al Mediene et al 2002;Rieger and Marra 1994). For unpruned and unthinned peach trees under no water stress, the shoot:root ratios observed ranged from 3.5 to 6.3, with an average of 4.6, which was taken as a parameter value (Table 1).…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data from Lescourret et al (1998) and Gibert et al (2005Gibert et al ( , 2010 S 59.22 Lescourret and Génard (2005) Reserve mobilisation Rm ls Leafy shoot and fine roots mobile fraction of reserves -Dimensionless 0.026 Lescourret and Génard (2005) Rm ow Old wood, coarse root and 1-year-old stem wood mobile fraction of reserves -Dimensionless 0.02 Moing and Gaudillère (1992), Ashworth et al (1993), Spann et al Mediene et al 2002;Rieger and Marra 1994). For unpruned and unthinned peach trees under no water stress, the shoot:root ratios observed ranged from 3.5 to 6.3, with an average of 4.6, which was taken as a parameter value (Table 1).…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A, AC Degreedays -1 0.0107 Data from Lescourret et al (1998) and Gibert et al (2005Gibert et al ( , 2010 S 4.04 9 10 -3 Lescourret and Génard (2005) DM max f Potential dry mass of fruits at maturity (Eq. 2) A, AC g 36.86…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cause of this disorder may be a consequence of reduced xylem density or hydraulic conductance that prevents adequate supply of water to the stylar end (Clearwater et al, 2012). At the fruit's surface, the pattern and the density of cuticular cracks (Gibert et al, 2007, 2010) together with the microclimate surrounding the fruit (Li et al, 2001; Saudreau et al, 2007) may impact water loss due to transpiration. As a consequence, the soluble solids content (sugar level) inside the fruit may change and thus ground a direct connection between the distribution of sugars inside the fruit and the biophysical properties of its skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, fruit micro-cracking, which is strongly related to fruit growth (Gibert et al 2007), changes fruit skin conductance to water vapour and, as a result, organoleptic quality, while at the same time rendering fruit more susceptible to fungal attack. By including the corresponding cracking and contamination models in QualiTree (Gibert et al , 2010 we could establish direct and original interactive links between fruit quality and pest development. In addition, pruning has a strong effect on both shoot growth and aphid infestation (Grechi et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%