2016
DOI: 10.3390/en9060436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification and Mitigation of Unfairness in Active Power Curtailment of Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems Using Sensitivity Based Coordinated Control

Abstract: Abstract:With increasing photovoltaic (PV) penetration in low voltage networks (LVNs), voltage regulation is a challenge. Active power curtailment (APC) is one possible solution for mitigating over voltages resulting from active power injection in LVNs. There is an inherent unfairness in the APC scheme. When generation is high and consumption is low, the voltages at the end of the feeder tend to be the highest. This results in high curtailment of active power output of the inverters located at the end of the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between these base variables is that the scheduled energy output and capacity factor omit unfairness due to for instance a bad location of the installation, which is implicitly included if the rated power of the installation is used as a base. The fairness index applied in [15] thus considers both the unfairness due to the location and the energy curtailment. To assess the unfairness resulting from system operation, the scheduled energy output or capacity factor are more appropriate base variables.…”
Section: Fairness In a Power System Reliability Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main difference between these base variables is that the scheduled energy output and capacity factor omit unfairness due to for instance a bad location of the installation, which is implicitly included if the rated power of the installation is used as a base. The fairness index applied in [15] thus considers both the unfairness due to the location and the energy curtailment. To assess the unfairness resulting from system operation, the scheduled energy output or capacity factor are more appropriate base variables.…”
Section: Fairness In a Power System Reliability Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, Strbac et al [14] recognize the importance of fairness, which they assess by studying detailed reliability data on graphs and in tables. Second, Latif et al [15] take this one step further in the context of active power curtailment of rooftop photovoltaic (PV) systems. They define two measures that quantify fairness: the standard deviation of the absolute amount of PV energy curtailment and the standard deviation of PV energy curtailment normalized to the rated power of the PV installation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in LV networks, where lines R/X ratio is above 1, it has been demonstrated that a better stability control would be achieved through P/V and Q/f droops [28][29][30], the paper focuses on present standard requirements, so it investigates solely the stabilizing functions defined in present grid codes (P/f and Q/V) to verify the effectiveness of currently required protections in avoiding dangerous operating conditions, in particular the unintentional islanding.…”
Section: Interface Protection System For Dgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latif et al . quantified curtailed energy by calculating the difference between the inverter active power output and maximum active power point [15]. Curtailment estimation based on inverter production data would require a system‐wide deployment of communications infrastructure to capture and relay data to system operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%