Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 2004
DOI: 10.1002/0471667196.ess2123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantal Response Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a statistical point of view, the shape of a dose-response curve at very low dose and very high dose, i.e. the tails of the response distribution, are subject to significant measurement error (Ashford, 1985;Morgan, 1992). A large uncertainty, or a lack of statistical power, always remains for any measure of biological response at low dose level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a statistical point of view, the shape of a dose-response curve at very low dose and very high dose, i.e. the tails of the response distribution, are subject to significant measurement error (Ashford, 1985;Morgan, 1992). A large uncertainty, or a lack of statistical power, always remains for any measure of biological response at low dose level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of subjects who respond at each dose level represents the cumulative distribution function of the probability of the response to radiation. We used the median effective dose (MED) as a measure to characterize this distribution, because the point estimator of the MED is not subject to measurement errors and is more reliable than the response at either tail of the distribution (Ashford, 1985;Morgan, 1992;Armitage and Colton, 1998). The MED is equivalent to ED 50a (the effective dose 50a), the dose that causes a measurable response in 0.5a probability (i.e.…”
Section: Mathematical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%