2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ancard.2016.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quand implanter un stimulateur cardiaque après remplacement valvulaire aortique percutané ? Revue de littérature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 These data show that the INTUITY valve has a slightly higher rate of early PPI than that reported for SAVR, which is approximately 3%, 18 and lower than TAVI whose reported PPI rate ranges from 8% to 30% according to the different type of TAVI device. 14,15,[19][20][21] In a meta-analysis of 14 studies about the Perceval Sutureless valve, it reported a mean rate of early PPI of 6.7%. 22 In our study, the incidence of primary end point (new-onset conduction disorders/worsening of preoperative conduction disorders) was 31.8%, without a significant difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 These data show that the INTUITY valve has a slightly higher rate of early PPI than that reported for SAVR, which is approximately 3%, 18 and lower than TAVI whose reported PPI rate ranges from 8% to 30% according to the different type of TAVI device. 14,15,[19][20][21] In a meta-analysis of 14 studies about the Perceval Sutureless valve, it reported a mean rate of early PPI of 6.7%. 22 In our study, the incidence of primary end point (new-onset conduction disorders/worsening of preoperative conduction disorders) was 31.8%, without a significant difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%