Quality, understandability and actionability of online patient education material about hypertension

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the value of websites accessible to patients looking for Web-based information regarding hypertension management. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional research was carried out by finding out Malay and English language websites about hypertension. For this purpose, the keywords “hypertension and treatment” were entered on the Yahoo, Google, Ask.com, Bing and DuckDuckGo search engines, and the first five pages of the results obtained were inspected. The DISCERN tool was deployed for evaluating the quality of information. The actionability and understandability were assessed through the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Eight assessors were asked to assess and grade the involved websites. Findings Of the 216 websites, eight (4.0%) conformed to the inclusion norms. All websites were classified into private, 4 (50%); government, 2 (25%) and personal, 2 (25%). The general rating of the eight websites was good (mean 51.6 ± 8.2 on a 75-point scale); however, half of the websites were rated as fair (mean 45.3 ± 3.1 on a 75-point scale). All websites conformed to the standard score of ≥70% for understandability (mean 76.1 ± 11.4), but none for actionability (mean 52.8 ± 13.9). Analysis of variance indicated there was no statistical difference with regards to quality (p = 0.525), understandability (p = 0.484) and actionability (p = 0.188) among the three website sets. Originality/value Considering the surplus of websites dedicated to information on hypertension, an independent assessment of the quality of these websites will be advantageous. Patients should be rendered high understandability, quality and actionability to evade deceptive online information.

Web-Based Nutrition and Physical Activity Education Intervention to Ameliorate Cardiometabolic Risks: A Single-Arm and Non-Randomized Feasibility Study

“…The PEMAT instrument has been used in numerous studies to assess the understandability and actionability of patient education materials. 28 - 30 The ability of the instrument to provide direct information on the good content of the material, the accuracy of visual aids, the choice of words, the appropriate layout and design, and the delivery strategies of the materials is the reason for choosing this instrument to evaluate the website in this study. In addition, the tool also provides suggestions for improving the teaching materials, including the consistent use of the active voice and the minimal use of medical jargon.…”

Assessment of patient education materials for age‐related macular degeneration

“…The PEMAT is a validated instrument designed to identify education materials that are suitable (i.e., not too complex) for patients with low levels of health literacy 15 . The PEMAT has been used to assess education materials in other areas of health care, such as in diabetes, 16 hypertension 17 and online information about heart failure, 18 with moderate to excellent inter‐rater reliability 19 . However, the PEMAT has not been used in eye care or ocular disease contexts.…”

An evaluation of the quality of online perinatal depression information

“…Materials are considered understandable or actionable if they reach a threshold of 70% or more on each measure [ 38 ]. The PEMAT has been used to assess the understandability and actionability of websites focused on various mental and physical health topics, including but not limited to perinatal anxiety, cervical cancer screening, and hypertension [ 7 , 39 , 40 ].…”