2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2005.1521705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-Temporal Transcoder Driven by the Jerkiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For decoded video without availability of the coding parameters, frame freeze can be simply detected by frame difference [85]; in the cases when the frame rate is available, the jerkiness effect can be evaluated using the frame rate [122,134,192] or more comprehensively, both the frame rate and temporal activity (i.e., motion) [60,91]. The location, number and duration of lost frames were estimated via inter-frame correlation analysis in [109], while lost frames and the density of group dropping were detected by inter-frame dissimilarity to measure fluidity in [126,127], in which it was concluded that, for the same level of frame loss, scattered fluidity breaks introduce less quality degradation than aggregated ones.…”
Section: Motion and Jerkinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For decoded video without availability of the coding parameters, frame freeze can be simply detected by frame difference [85]; in the cases when the frame rate is available, the jerkiness effect can be evaluated using the frame rate [122,134,192] or more comprehensively, both the frame rate and temporal activity (i.e., motion) [60,91]. The location, number and duration of lost frames were estimated via inter-frame correlation analysis in [109], while lost frames and the density of group dropping were detected by inter-frame dissimilarity to measure fluidity in [126,127], in which it was concluded that, for the same level of frame loss, scattered fluidity breaks introduce less quality degradation than aggregated ones.…”
Section: Motion and Jerkinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key related works on objective temporal quality metric design include [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Feghali et al [8] use frame rate as the scaling factor to adjust Peak-Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (PSNR) and output a spatial-temporal quality score.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,17,10,9], same amount of dropping loss may introduce different temporal quality impact because of different motion activity; higher motion activity usually results in larger temporal quality degradation. Therefore, the dropping severity s m,n should be mapped to s m,n according to motion activity by…”
Section: Motion Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this effect, we propose subtracting a jerkiness factor J from the optimistic left PSNR, in such a way to place the resulting measure (Q) closer to the optimistic or pessimistic left PSNR value depending on the motion activity of the video. For the n-th frame, a motion activity measure can be defined by [10] NZ I (1) where N I and N NZ are the number of Intra Macroblocks (MBs) and the number of MBs in which there exist nonzero motion vectors in a local region r of the n-th frame respectively, P I is a weight for Intra MBs that is set to 128 (the maximum of motion vector for a 64×64 motion search window) and mvx i and mvy i are the horizontal and vertical components of the i-th motion vector. We divide a frame spatially into nine regions, which include equal number of MBs, and compute MA r , r=1,…,9, in each region.…”
Section: An Objective Measure For Stereo Videomentioning
confidence: 99%