2016
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality, Sensory and Nutritional Characteristics of Cookies Fortified with Chestnut Flour

Abstract: The influence of the physicochemical properties of chestnut flour (CF) on the cookies quality was investigated. The experiments are planned on the base of 32 factorial plan with independent variables: chestnut flour quantity (20, 40 and 60% based on wheat flour) and moisture dough (20, 22 and 24%). The physical and sensory attributes of CF cookies were compared to control sample containing 100% wheat flour (WF). Substitution of WF with CF contributes to the increased cookies hardness for 10–40%. By increasing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
9
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was added to the cookies to increase their organoleptic and nutritional quality. 6 4.24 ± 0.01 nd 3 C15:0 7 3.82 ± 0.01 nd 3 C16:0 8 16.22 ± 0.01 26.54 ± 0.03 * C16:1 9 3.93 ± 0.03 nd 3 C17:0 10 3.81 ± 0.02 nd 3 C18:0 11 4.80 ± 0.01 22.23 ± 0.02 * C18:1n9c 12 35.25 ± 0.14 nd 3 C18:2n6c 13 7.20 ± 0.01 28.37 ± 0.01 * C18:3n3 14 4.45 ± 0.02 22.86 ± 0.02 * C20:0 15 4.22 ± 0.01 nd 3 C21:1 16 4.17 ± 0.01 nd 3 C22:0 17 3.940 ± 0.003 nd 3 Total SFA 18 45.01 ± 0.09 48.78 ± 0.01 * Total MUFA 19 43.4 ± 0.1 nd 3 Total PUFA 20 11.65 ± 0.01 51.22 ± 0.01 1 Chickpea flour; 2 Chestnut flour; 3 Not detected; 4 Trace amount; 5 Capric acid; 6 Myristic acid; 7 Pentadecylic acid; 8 Palmitic acid, 9 Palmitoleic acid; 10 Margaric acid, 11 Stearic acid, 12 Oleic acid; 13 Linoleic acid; 14 α-Linolenic acid; 15 Arachidic acid; 16 Heneicosylic acid, 17 Behenic acid. 18 SFA: saturated fatty acids; 19 MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids.…”
Section: Nutritional Profile and Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was added to the cookies to increase their organoleptic and nutritional quality. 6 4.24 ± 0.01 nd 3 C15:0 7 3.82 ± 0.01 nd 3 C16:0 8 16.22 ± 0.01 26.54 ± 0.03 * C16:1 9 3.93 ± 0.03 nd 3 C17:0 10 3.81 ± 0.02 nd 3 C18:0 11 4.80 ± 0.01 22.23 ± 0.02 * C18:1n9c 12 35.25 ± 0.14 nd 3 C18:2n6c 13 7.20 ± 0.01 28.37 ± 0.01 * C18:3n3 14 4.45 ± 0.02 22.86 ± 0.02 * C20:0 15 4.22 ± 0.01 nd 3 C21:1 16 4.17 ± 0.01 nd 3 C22:0 17 3.940 ± 0.003 nd 3 Total SFA 18 45.01 ± 0.09 48.78 ± 0.01 * Total MUFA 19 43.4 ± 0.1 nd 3 Total PUFA 20 11.65 ± 0.01 51.22 ± 0.01 1 Chickpea flour; 2 Chestnut flour; 3 Not detected; 4 Trace amount; 5 Capric acid; 6 Myristic acid; 7 Pentadecylic acid; 8 Palmitic acid, 9 Palmitoleic acid; 10 Margaric acid, 11 Stearic acid, 12 Oleic acid; 13 Linoleic acid; 14 α-Linolenic acid; 15 Arachidic acid; 16 Heneicosylic acid, 17 Behenic acid. 18 SFA: saturated fatty acids; 19 MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids.…”
Section: Nutritional Profile and Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chickpea flour;2 Chestnut flour;3 Not detected;4 Trace amount; 5 Lauric acid;6 Myristic acid,7 Pentadecylic acid;8 Palmitic acid;9 Palmitoleic acid,10 Margaric acid;11 Stearic acid;12 Oleic acid;13 Linoleic acid; 14 α-Linolenic acid;15 Arachidic acid;16 Eicosenoic acid;17 Eicosadienoic acid;18 Behenic acid;19 Erucic acid;20 Lignoceric acid 21. Saturated fatty acids;22 Monounsaturated fatty acids;23 Polyunsaturated fatty acids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical and textural characteristics of biscuits, especially hardness, are important characteristics for consumer acceptance [10]. Changes in the nutritional composition and textural properties of biscuits using fortified flour as a replacement for wheat flour have been studied [11][12][13][14][15]. Different materials and methods led to important physicochemical changes in the final product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During five months of 2016, it was important to improve the dosage of the sodium bicarbonate and the control of the temperature of the dough both in the third stage of the mixture (92% efficacy) to obtain the pH of the cookies established as standard (8.5). The weight of the sodium bicarbonate was greater than 9 kg and the temperature of the dough was greater than 32°C, which is not desirable for this type of cookie (Soronja-Simovic et al 2017). Pérez-Castañeda and León-Salazar (2017) found bicarbonate added as the problem in the quality of cookies by DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control) method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%