Quality retention of chest compression after repetitive practices with or without feedback devices: A randomized manikin study

Zhou, Xianlong; Wang, Jing; Jin, Xiaoqing; Zhao, Yan; Liu, Ruiling; Jiang, Cheng

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.04.025

Cited by 23 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…22 However, it is not recommended to implement real time CPR feedback devices routinely because their use has no significant effect on resuscitation outcome compared with not using them at all. [23][24][25][26] Nevertheless, real time CPR feedback devices in medical systems can be used for monitoring CPR quality. No studies have proven the usefulness of checking the pulse to evaluate the effectiveness of chest compressions during CPR.…”

Section: Feedback Device and Monitoring During Alsmentioning

confidence: 99%

2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 4. Adult advanced life support

Cha

Lee

et al. 2021

Clin Exp Emerg Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adult advanced life support (ALS) is an important part of the chain of survival, promoting systemic circulation and oxygen supply during high-quality basic life support in patients with cardiac arrest. It includes advanced airway management, manual defibrillation, pharmacological therapy with vasopressors and antiarrhythmic agents, use of an extracorporeal circulation device, and other techniques to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). [1][2][3] Several milestone studies on ALS have been published since the publication of the 2015 Korean cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines. These include a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of epinephrine in patients with out-ofhospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) as well as a comparative study on amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in patients with refractory shockable rhythm. 4,5 A study comparing the use of a supraglottic airway (SGA) device and endotracheal intubation for advanced airway management during OHCA S27

show abstract

Section: Feedback Device and Monitoring During Alsmentioning

confidence: 99%

2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 4. Adult advanced life support

Cha

Lee

et al. 2021

Clin Exp Emerg Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We identified lowcertainty evidence (downgraded for risk of bias and indirectness) from 2 RCTs. The first 331 reported no difference in CPR performance between a group of laypeople trained with a CPR feedback device compared with a control group at 1 year after training. In the second study of CPR training of healthcare providers, 319 both control and feedback groups improved from baseline at 1 year after training, but there was no difference between the control and feedback groups.…”

Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Training. We identified 5 RCTs 324,327,329,331,332 that addressed this outcome. We identified low-certainty evidence (downgraded for risk of bias and indirectness) from 4 RCTs that used true feedback devices.…”

Section: Cpr Performance From Training Conclusion To 1 Year Aftermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We identified low-certainty evidence (downgraded for risk of bias and indirectness) from 4 RCTs that used true feedback devices. 324,327,329,331 All of these studies were in laypeople or junior healthcare providers, and they reported improvements in retention of CPR skills at 7 days to 3 months after training.…”

Section: Cpr Performance From Training Conclusion To 1 Year Aftermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study reported an improved compression rate (RR of compression rate between 100 and 120/min, 1.72; 1.17À2.55) compared with learners with no access to a guidance device. We identified 5 RCTs 324,327,329,331,332 that addressed this outcome.…”

Section: Cpr Performance From Training Conclusion To 1 Year Aftermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations