Quality of tender documents: case studies from the UK

Abstract

Tendering is one of the stages in construction procurement that requires extensive information and documents exchange. However, tender documents are not always clear in practice. The aim of this study was to ascertain the clarity and adequacy of tender documents used in practice. Access was negotiated into two UK construction firms and the whole tender process for two projects was shadowed for six to seven weeks in each firm using an ethnographic approach. A significant amount of tender queries, amendments and addenda were recorded. This showed that quality of tender documentation is still a problem in construction despite the existence of Co‐ordinated Project Information (1987) and British Standard 1192 (1984, 1990, 2007) that are meant to help in producing clear and consistent project information. Poor quality tender documents are a source of inaccurate estimates, claims and disputes on contracts. Six recommendations are presented to help in improving the quality of tender documentation. Further research is needed into the recommendations to help improve the quality of tender documents, perhaps in conjunction with an industry‐wide investigation into the level of incorporation of CPI principles in practice.Case study, contractor, tender documentation, tendering, UK,

Sources of contractor’s payment risks and cash flow problems in the New Zealand construction industry: project team’s perceptions of the risks and mitigation measures

“…Poor contract documentation as one of the critical risk factors affecting cash flow was also corroborated by Laryea (2011) in a recent study of the clarity and adequacy of tender documents used in practice in the UK. Laryea found that poor quality tender documents are a source of inaccurate estimates, claims and disputes on contracts.…”

Scoring rules and abnormally low bids criteria in construction tenders: a taxonomic review

“…Consequently, ESF selection by auctioneers in practice is invariably a highly intuitive and subjective process (Holt et al, 1994b(Holt et al, , 1994c, involving few theoretical or empirical considerations. This produces scoring rules in practice that are often poorly designed (Bergman and Lundberg, 2013) and affected by internal consistency and validity problems (Borcherding et al, 1991); this situation is unfortunately shared with other tender documents and leads to cost estimate inaccuracy, claims and disputes (Laryea, 2011).…”

Critical Factors Inhibiting Performance of Small- and Medium-Scale Contractors in Sub-Saharan Region: A Case for Malawi

“…Tendering is the process used by many construction clients to obtain the programme and price for building a project [53]. Tendering typically consists of three parts: deciding on the type of contract and the terms and conditions that would form the basis of the contractual relationship and under which the work will be done; selecting the most suitable contractor given the budget and time available; and establishing the contract price [53]. Important elements at tender preparation stage include the following:…”