2015
DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.154395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of sunglasses available in the Iranian market; a study with emphasis on sellers′ license

Abstract: Context:Sunglasses should follow minimum requirements to sufficiently protect eyes. It is not known whether all items obtainable from the market are appropriately designed.Aims:To compare ultraviolet (UV)-protective properties of commercially available sunglasses obtained from authorized and unauthorized Iranian sellers.Settings and Study Design:An analytic-descriptive study performed in a metropolitan area (Tehran).Materials and Methods:Using a UV-visible standard spectrophotometer, the percentage transmittan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But the remaining 27.0% of nonprescription sunglasses available in the Ethiopian market failed to protect the harmful ultraviolet radiation up to 400 nm. This result was lower as compared to 92.6% protection of nonprescription sunglasses determined by Bazzazi N. 20 Poor regulation of nonprescription sunglasses during importation, distribution and dispensing to users might contribute for bulk availability of substandard nonprescription sunglasses in the study area. Relaying on brands of nonprescription sunglasses and dispensing before test for UVR protection may likely contribute to poor compliance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But the remaining 27.0% of nonprescription sunglasses available in the Ethiopian market failed to protect the harmful ultraviolet radiation up to 400 nm. This result was lower as compared to 92.6% protection of nonprescription sunglasses determined by Bazzazi N. 20 Poor regulation of nonprescription sunglasses during importation, distribution and dispensing to users might contribute for bulk availability of substandard nonprescription sunglasses in the study area. Relaying on brands of nonprescription sunglasses and dispensing before test for UVR protection may likely contribute to poor compliance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Thus, sunglasses provided by unauthorized sellers were alarmingly unreliable and could potentially hazardous for the eyes. 20,21 Manufacturers lack to explicit the characteristics of sunglass products and simply advertise as UVR absorbing. 22 The cost of sunglass is not always an indication of good quality in protecting UVR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 73 ] More expensive brand-name sunglasses do not guarantee optimal protection against UVR. [ 74 ] To prevent UV damage to the eyes, people should wear sunglasses for outdoor activities such as driving, participating in sports, or taking a walk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Australian and New Zealand standard (AS/NZS 1067) and the South African Standard (SANS 1644) require a stricter transmittance of up to 400 nm as defined by ICNIRP (ICNIRP 2004). Standards for manufacture and sale of sunglasses may not exist or be applied in low- and middle-income countries ( Bazzazi et al 2015 ). Unfortunately, to date there are no clinical trials demonstrating the effectiveness of sunglasses in cataract prevention to support the common-sense guidance on the use of sunglasses in the Global Solar UV Index guidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%