2005
DOI: 10.1185/030079905x38123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association: a 10-year follow-up study

Abstract: We found a consistency in abstract quality regardless of the precise format used by different journals. This indicates that the framework for research articles already in place should be maintained and further modification of the framework may not necessarily improve the abstract quality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of discrepancies we found between the structured abstracts and full texts in the six journals examined was quite large (53.33%), but consistent with previous observations by Taddio et al 18 and Wong et al 38 For us, this was surprising considering that these were highly regarded medical journals with a high median impact factor. The discrepancies found were mostly due to inconsistencies in numerical data between the abstract and those in the full text, but were regarded as clinically not significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The proportion of discrepancies we found between the structured abstracts and full texts in the six journals examined was quite large (53.33%), but consistent with previous observations by Taddio et al 18 and Wong et al 38 For us, this was surprising considering that these were highly regarded medical journals with a high median impact factor. The discrepancies found were mostly due to inconsistencies in numerical data between the abstract and those in the full text, but were regarded as clinically not significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, if they do, it is very likely that they first read the abstracts [42]. We also considered that although the format of abstract is usually imposed by journals, they always contain the key messages in the article [43]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The titles and abstracts for all eligible articles ( n = 1459) were reviewed by the first author (DAC). From the 185 articles describing education experiments, we selected for full review a random sample of 110 articles, an adequate sample size in comparison with those of previous studies with similar intent 7,14–16 . Sampling was weighted by the number of education experiments reported in each journal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%