DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036527125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of service modeling and analysis for carrier ethernet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ReCipe 2016 Midpoint method, which integrates the midpoint assessment of CML-IA and the endpoint assessment of Eco-indicator 99, is selected as the impact assessment method. ReCipe 2016 Midpoint method contains the widest range of midpoint impact categories, allowing for the application of characterization factors within these categories at an international scale [34]. In Compressor kWh/t CO2 77.1…”
Section: Life Cycle Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ReCipe 2016 Midpoint method, which integrates the midpoint assessment of CML-IA and the endpoint assessment of Eco-indicator 99, is selected as the impact assessment method. ReCipe 2016 Midpoint method contains the widest range of midpoint impact categories, allowing for the application of characterization factors within these categories at an international scale [34]. In Compressor kWh/t CO2 77.1…”
Section: Life Cycle Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of Roy et al builds on earlier work demonstrating the use of SRMs for LCA. 24,[66][67][68] The air quality models GEOS-Chem, CMAQ, and CAMx feature similar coverage of pollutants and F&T mechanisms. Each model uses emissions data as input, which in all three cases includes industrial and mobile sources, biomass burning, agricultural emissions, and dust, with the flexibility to include additional sources.…”
Section: Fate and Transport In The Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(19) For chemical emissions to outdoor media, impact characterization draws from risk assessment (RA) principles by accounting for a chemical's release, transport, fate, human exposure, and toxicological effects when arriving at a potential impact metric. (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) Efforts to develop assessment methods for the impacts of exposures to indoor and workplace sources primarily focus on extending the human toxicity assessment approaches developed for far-field sources to include near-field media such as indoor air and other exposure routes such as dermal uptake. (3,11,16) However, these methods often do not address some of the choices made when the far-field methods were first developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%