2008 IEEE International Workshop on Satellite and Space Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iwssc.2008.4656767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of service evaluation in satellite systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The QoS issue should be dealt with addressing the diverse network layers and the QoS architecture, and assessing the application and network behaviour. In addition to classic QoS metrics [16], subjective metrics should also be introduced in order to evaluate the IP applications from a user point of view, such as PSNR (Peak Signal to Noise Ratio) and MOS (Mean Opinion Score) [28]. The data to be transmitted is characterized mainly in terms of bit rate, overhead, error rates (BER [Bit Error Rate], or PER [Packet Error Rate]), delay, jitter, average and maximum packet sizes.…”
Section: Qos Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QoS issue should be dealt with addressing the diverse network layers and the QoS architecture, and assessing the application and network behaviour. In addition to classic QoS metrics [16], subjective metrics should also be introduced in order to evaluate the IP applications from a user point of view, such as PSNR (Peak Signal to Noise Ratio) and MOS (Mean Opinion Score) [28]. The data to be transmitted is characterized mainly in terms of bit rate, overhead, error rates (BER [Bit Error Rate], or PER [Packet Error Rate]), delay, jitter, average and maximum packet sizes.…”
Section: Qos Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This module is a post-processing module in charge of computing the transmission link performance mainly in terms of link availability, bit rate, error rates (BER or PER), delay, jitter, average and maximum packet sizes in order to characterize the application-level QoS, but also in terms of IP throughput, IP traffic characteristics (Tou et al, 2008) (inter-packet delay, IP delay variation, one way delay with maximum and minimum values, packet losses), and IP over frame efficiency over the DVB-S2 (in connection with the encapsulation overhead and the MODCODs selected, and more generally the implemented adaptive strategy), as well as in terms of attenuation prediction errors. Some performance figures related to VoIP over DVB-S2 links have been made available in recent studies , and could serve as a reference basis for the present project, in particular regarding a comparison between GSE and MPE/ULE encapsulation schemes.…”
Section: Extern Matlab Post-processing Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectively, some measures realized on Ourses-Project [11] using a DVB-S2/RCS system using a Ka-Band link show that timeouts barely occur and TCP works finally most of the time as congestion avoidance instead of a slow start at the beginning of the connection.…”
Section: A a Fluid-flow Model Of Tcp Congestion Control Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%