2016
DOI: 10.4236/jcc.2016.44006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Service Analysis of Ethernet Network Based on Packet Size

Abstract: Ethernet network, standardized by IEEE 802.3, is vastly installed in Local Area Network (LAN) for cheaper cost and reliability. With the emergence of cost effective and enhanced user experience needs, the Quality of Service (QoS) of the underlying Ethernet network has become a major issue. A network must provide predictable, reliable and guaranteed services. The required QoS on the network is achieved through managing the end-to-end delay, throughput, jitter, transmission rate and many other network performanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T j = 0.5ms; the packet length in the data stream uses the maximum packet length in Ethernet, i.e. 1.5KB [20], and the number of packets burst in the subsystem is k, except for data stream a i . The burst amount of the data stream b (a i ) k (j) = k × 1.5 KB; the service rate of the subsystems are all 20,000KB/s, i.e.…”
Section: End-to-end Delay Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T j = 0.5ms; the packet length in the data stream uses the maximum packet length in Ethernet, i.e. 1.5KB [20], and the number of packets burst in the subsystem is k, except for data stream a i . The burst amount of the data stream b (a i ) k (j) = k × 1.5 KB; the service rate of the subsystems are all 20,000KB/s, i.e.…”
Section: End-to-end Delay Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of service offered by a network for an application is defined as the level of performance in terms of QoS [1] which may vary for each application. Real time applications cannot adapt to delay in traffic whereas non real time applications can tolerate delay.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%