2015
DOI: 10.3846/btp.2015.487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of medical services: problems, evaluation and regulation

Abstract: One of the most acute problems in the healthcare industry – the problem of the quality of medical services. In this area, there is no established definition of medical services or approaches to quality management. The aim of the article is to analyze the existing definitions of “quality of medical services,” as well as development approach to managing medical organization. At the same time the management of the medical organization should be focused on ensuring the quality as the most important criterion for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…patients) (Chamberlain et al, 1984). Quality of service in this area of health care thus needs to be treated as a complex decision problem (Phillips et al, 2015;Yerdavletova and Mukhambetov, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…patients) (Chamberlain et al, 1984). Quality of service in this area of health care thus needs to be treated as a complex decision problem (Phillips et al, 2015;Yerdavletova and Mukhambetov, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, researchers have focused on the design of a service quality evaluation system. Parasuraman et al proposed a conceptual service quality model, hoping to stimulate the interest of academia and quality service practitioners in providing a framework for further empirical research in this important field (Parasuraman et al, 1985;Yerdavletova & Mukhambetov, 2015). Ayanian included patient care in the medical quality evaluation system (Ayanian & Markel, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%