Quality of life outcomes associated with variable posttransplant prednisone dosing regimens

Abstract

Prednisone tapering has become more common in the management of transplant recipients. Benefits of this practice, however, must be weighed against the risks. This study identified outcomes associated with variable low dose prednisone protocols. The study sample included 98 kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients 1 year after transplant. Graft function, side effects of steroid therapy, and quality of life were recorded on patients receiving 0 (n = 5), 1 to 5 (n = 4), 5 to 7.5 (n = 5), 7.5 to 10 (n = 21), and greater than 10 mg/d prednisone (n = 63). Despite the fact that patients were assigned to the low dose groups because they were at risk for or already experiencing steroid induced side effects, the low dose groups presented side effect and quality of life profiles similar to or better than those of the standard dose group.

Assessing Health Status and Health Care Utilization in Adolescents with Chronic Kidney Disease

“…Although statistically significant differences are important to note, Riley et al (20,21) reported that a score differential of 3 points (0.6 SD) is correlated with meaningful clinical differences. Using this more stringent criteria, CKD patients' functional health is comparable to that of their peers except in the area of physical activity, where they report being less physically active than control group adolescents.…”

Charting the Course of Transplant Nursing: An Interview with Rebecca P. Winsett, RN, PhD

“…Her doctoral studies laid the foundation for quality-of-life studies and social network mapping. Her many papers [2][3][4][5] reflect this work with colleagues and mentors at the University of Tennessee.…”

The HRQoL of renal transplant patients

“…The concept represents individual responses to the physical, mental, and social effects of illness on daily living, which influence the extent to which personal satisfaction with the circumstances of life can be achieved (Lukkarinen & Hentinen, 1998). QoL is also a result of a patient's perceptions, and the unique experiences of life, and the cultural, ethnic, and religious values of an individual determine how it is judged (Hathaway et al. , 1996).…”