2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4293-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life of survivors of malignant pleural mesothelioma in Japan: a cross sectional study

Abstract: BackgroundPrevious studies have indicated that people with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) have a poor quality of life (QOL); however, information about the QOL of people with MPM in Japan is anecdotal. The aims of this study were to investigate the QOL of survivors of MPM in Japan and to determine the factors that correlate with their QOL.MethodsThis was a cross sectional study. The included patients were those diagnosed with MPM in Japan. We created a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 64 que… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the findings further, the individuals’ accounts often voiced deep and pervasive feelings of psychosocial trauma that permeated and defined much of their experiences living with mesothelioma. This aligns with survey data showing that mesothelioma patients have a lower quality of life compared with healthy controls (Granieri et al, 2013; Kao et al, 2013; Nagamatsu et al, 2018; Nowak et al, 2004). Several factors are likely to contextualize and contribute toward the distress felt by individual patients, including the onset of physical symptoms that inhibit daily routine and social activity (Kao et al, 2013), intensive medical treatments that regularly present with unpleasant side-effects (Clayson et al, 2005), and an uncertain but dismal prognosis that induces feelings of mortality salience (Walker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the findings further, the individuals’ accounts often voiced deep and pervasive feelings of psychosocial trauma that permeated and defined much of their experiences living with mesothelioma. This aligns with survey data showing that mesothelioma patients have a lower quality of life compared with healthy controls (Granieri et al, 2013; Kao et al, 2013; Nagamatsu et al, 2018; Nowak et al, 2004). Several factors are likely to contextualize and contribute toward the distress felt by individual patients, including the onset of physical symptoms that inhibit daily routine and social activity (Kao et al, 2013), intensive medical treatments that regularly present with unpleasant side-effects (Clayson et al, 2005), and an uncertain but dismal prognosis that induces feelings of mortality salience (Walker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mesothelioma bears a high symptom burden, with pronounced dyspnea, pain, fatigue, and disturbed sleep greatly reducing patient well-being and quality-of-life (Kao et al, 2013; Nagamatsu et al, 2018; Nowak et al, 2004). Moreover, both patients and their carers report poignant feelings of hopelessness that important life goals can no longer be achieved, nor problems solved (Granieri et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue was also a prominent physical symptom in our study, in common with other reports 28,29 . It is a key physical symptom predictive of survival and an established unmet need within the cancer population 9,17 .…”
Section: Independence and Support/familysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fatigue was also a prominent physical symptom in our study, in common with other reports. 28,29 It is a key physical symptom predictive of survival and an established unmet need within the cancer population. 9,17 Fatigue is common, with up to 86% of participants in the intervention arm of our study reporting such (from the SPARC tool), and at least 27% reporting “tiredness” in the overall cohort (from the QLQ-C30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a part of a major study about QOL and intention of care among MPM patients. This study is a cross-sectional descriptive study that used a mailed survey [15]. In brief, an invitation to participate in the study was sent to 422 cancer hospitals in Japan; 64 hospitals (15.2%) agreed to participate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%