1986
DOI: 10.1177/014107688607900311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Life Measurements in Patients with Malignant Disease: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The QL Index is already regarded as a valuable summary measure of quality of life in cancer patients (Clark & Fallowfield, 1986). The results presented here suggest that it may also be of some use in reducing prognostic uncertainty in terminal care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The QL Index is already regarded as a valuable summary measure of quality of life in cancer patients (Clark & Fallowfield, 1986). The results presented here suggest that it may also be of some use in reducing prognostic uncertainty in terminal care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been interest in using performance status and quality of life measures to aid prognosis. The Karnofsky Index, which is often used by clinicians to assess performance status (Clark & Fallowfield, 1986), has been shown to have a weak but positive relationship with the length of life remaining (Evans & McCarthy, 1985;Mor et al, 1984;Yates et al, 1980). However, the Index has been criticised because it is rated by clinicians, rather than patients, and large discrepancies have been reported between assessments made by clinicians and patient assessments of quality of life (Padilla et al, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
(Clark & Fallowfield, 1986; Knippenberg, 1985;Fayers & Jones, 1983; Holland, 1984;McDowell & Newell, 1987;Selby & Robertson, 1987;Ventafridda et al, 1986;Walker & Rosser, 1988;Tchekmedyian & Cella, 1990).We earlier reported the development of a method for assessing the quality of life of breast cancer patients based on self assessment by multiple linear analogue scales (Selby et al, 1984
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the inclusion of QOL measures in major clinical trials is still rare, in considerable part, due to the lack of valid, reliable and practical measures (Clark & Fallowfield, 1986). The definition and measurement of QOL are fraught with philosophical and methodological difficulties which are yet to be resolved (Aaronson et al, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%