Quality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping review

Abstract

Purpose To identify instruments used to measure parents’ Quality of Life (QoL) during pregnancy and the postpartum period, and to describe their characteristics and psychometric properties. Methods For this scoping review we conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and HaPI in mid-December 2020, to identify studies evaluating psychometric properties. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) were used to define and categorize psychometric properties. Two reviewers screened the studies independently, and customized screening questions were used to assess eligibility against inclusion criteria. Data were systematically extracted into a predesigned data charting matrix, and descriptively analyzed. Results The searches identified 5671 studies, of which 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, there were 19 QoL instruments: 12 generic and seven period specific. The most reported instruments were SF-36, SF-12 and WHOQOL-BREF, and the most evaluated instruments were SF-12, WHOQOL-BREF, QOL-GRAV, and PQOL. We found that none of the identified instruments had been evaluated for all nine psychometric properties recommended by the COSMIN. The most reported psychometric properties were internal consistency and structural validity. The instruments were primarily assessed in parents residing in Asia (50%), and 83% of the studies were conducted from 2010 to 2020. Only three studies included psychometric measures assessed on fathers. Conclusion Our review shows there is extensive evidence on the internal consistency and structural validity of QoL instruments used on parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period, but that the evidence on other psychometric properties is sparse. Validation studies and primary studies are needed to provide evidence on the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of QoL instruments for this target group, in particular for fathers and partners.

How the structural determinants of health inequities impact access to prescription medication for pregnant women in Australia: a narrative review

“…Furthermore, there are difficulties associated with measuring health outcomes (generally measured in quality adjusted life years (QALYs)) in pregnant women 46 and whether, or how, to incorporate both maternal health outcomes and fetal health outcomes, or any enduring effects medication use might impart on the offspring. The evaluation and incorporation of health outcomes other than those experienced by individuals in a trial is not common practice, although discussion around methods to facilitate this is increasing.…”

Designing economic evaluations alongside clinical trials in maternal health care: A guide for clinical trial design

“…The most common HRQoL measures used in maternity care are the EQ‐5D, SF‐36, SF‐12, and the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Scale‐BREF (WHOQoL‐BREF)—all of which are generic measures 36 . Currently, no maternity‐specific QoL measures are in widespread used, and there have been calls for further work in this area as it is considered that current measures may not be adequate for measuring QoL in maternity care 36,37 . In addition to the instrument to be used, the researcher also needs to specify the time points at which the instrument will be used, which should be designed to reflect the likely time points at which quality of life will be affected.…”

Subjective well-being, happiness, and environmental health factors related to women planning a pregnancy or pregnant, using mobile health intervention

“…This study did not implement the use of quality of life (QoL) scales to measure subjective well-being in women's pregnancy preparation. 87 However, it is the subjective nature of self-assessment by women through simply asking in our questionnaire, “How happy and emotionally prepared do you feel as a future mother?,” associations arise as a proxy for environmental risk factors for reproduction. For future studies, it is recommended to expand the information, and offer personalized health reports as a result of the mobile health application, to newborns, children, and adolescents, taking the offspring into account.…”