2013
DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.6.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in persons with voice disorders: A review of patient-reported outcome measures

Abstract: This article provides concise reviews of widely-used quality of life (QOL) instruments for use with persons with voice disorders. Designed primarily for English-speaking persons, the reviewed instruments are delineated by title and population served, i.e. adult or paediatric. Each review reports the purpose of the QOL instrument as well as its psychometric soundness. Future voice-related QOL instruments are briefly considered. Finally, the appendices include tables with currently-available translations and kno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 Self-perceived voice difficulties adversely affect quality of life. [14][15][16] They also affect individuals' occupational performance and prospects. Voice difficulties are associated with absence from work, considering career change, inability to complete occupational requirements and limiting interactions with colleagues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Self-perceived voice difficulties adversely affect quality of life. [14][15][16] They also affect individuals' occupational performance and prospects. Voice difficulties are associated with absence from work, considering career change, inability to complete occupational requirements and limiting interactions with colleagues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated annual healthcare cost of these patients totals hundreds of million dollars, which is comparable to that for other chronic diseases [9]. In general, the negative impact of voice disorders on quality of life targets not only the occupational group but also the general population of all societies [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely studied element of respondent burden is readability. Readability has received considerable attention in recent communication sciences and disorders literature (e.g., Abou-Diab et al, 2019; Slavych et al, 2013; Zraick et al, 2012). Readability is known as “the ease with which a person can read and understand written materials” (Freda, 2005, p. 152), and incorporates style of writing (Klare, 1976), degree of clarity (Hargis et al, 1998), characteristics of the intended reader (McLaughlin, 1969), and the intended purpose of the text (DuBay, 2004).…”
Section: Prom Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the reading level criterion, the target population should be considered (e.g., underlying cognitive and/or linguistic deficits; Francis et al, 2016;Reeves et al, 2013). Notably, many PROMs used in clinical speech-language pathology are written beyond a fifth-grade reading level (e.g., Doak et al, 1996;Slavych et al, 2013;Zraick et al, 2012), despite readability evidence and recommendations (Stefu et al, 2021). However, PROMs included in these studies were developed for clinical populations without language impairment (e.g., persons with swallowing disorders; Zraick et al, 2012); therefore, the impact of PROM reading level on PWA is unspecified.…”
Section: Readabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%