2009
DOI: 10.1080/13607860902845558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients: Differences in patient and spouse perceptions

Abstract: Patients and spouses perceive patient QOL and predictors of patient QOL differently. Implications include the need to be aware of negative bias in spouse ratings of patients of QOL and other psychosocial variables, especially when spouse perceptions are considered by health care professionals. Discussing differences in patient and spouse perceptions in clinical settings with both patients and spouses will allow for a more comprehensive understanding of patient status.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A tendency for proxy values to be lower than self-reported values has been previously reported [13,15] and is also found for other quality of life measures [41]; however, some studies have found this tendency to be reduced in ranking exercises [42]. A tendency for proxy values to be lower than self-report may also explain why depression was associated with smaller differences between EQ-5D-S and EQ-5D-P. Depression affects the residents' overview of other aspects of their health, and so a depressed resident is more likely to view their health as poor, in line with the proxy's assessment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A tendency for proxy values to be lower than self-reported values has been previously reported [13,15] and is also found for other quality of life measures [41]; however, some studies have found this tendency to be reduced in ranking exercises [42]. A tendency for proxy values to be lower than self-report may also explain why depression was associated with smaller differences between EQ-5D-S and EQ-5D-P. Depression affects the residents' overview of other aspects of their health, and so a depressed resident is more likely to view their health as poor, in line with the proxy's assessment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…First, it has been acknowledged that the modality may alter the interview and, more specifically, the use of telephone interviews for qualitative research is considered by some to reduce the quality of data obtained [ 70 ]. However, this method has been used successfully in previous research both during the current pandemic and in previous research into QoL of adults with ESRD [ 71 , 72 ]. Nonetheless, the choice of telephones, as opposed to online video platforms, was informed by patient and public involvement during the trial design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the non-equivalence of self-report and proxy report is acknowledged, some studies have found that the systematic difference between average self-reported and proxy-reported quality of life score is modest [16, 18, 41, 53, 6466] or not significant [55, 6769]. In which case, if the development of a proxy version of a quality of life instrument was primarily motivated by the minimisation of ‘proxy bias’ or the reduction of the inter-proxy gap [45], it would be reasonable to question the usefulness of developing a proxy version if the inter-proxy gap is negligible in large survey data collections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%