2014
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2014.915923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in dementia: a systematically conducted narrative review of dementia-specific measurement scales

Abstract: The lack of consensus on measuring QoL in dementia suggests a need for a broader, more rigorously tested QoL measure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
193
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
193
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the pragmatic character of this study, reflecting daily care for persons with dementia in LTCF, only one (contact) nurse of the patient (instead of two nurses) filled the instrument; this is a limitation of the study because the developers of the QUALIDEM advise to use the answers reached by a consensus between two nurses. In the present study only the 18 questions suitable for very severe dementia (GDS 7) were used, because these questions are reliable for use in patients with mild dementia as well as those with very severe dementia [18,32,55]. A short instrument that can be filled out by one person would be more feasible [20,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the pragmatic character of this study, reflecting daily care for persons with dementia in LTCF, only one (contact) nurse of the patient (instead of two nurses) filled the instrument; this is a limitation of the study because the developers of the QUALIDEM advise to use the answers reached by a consensus between two nurses. In the present study only the 18 questions suitable for very severe dementia (GDS 7) were used, because these questions are reliable for use in patients with mild dementia as well as those with very severe dementia [18,32,55]. A short instrument that can be filled out by one person would be more feasible [20,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the rating of QOL between self-report and proxy report generally depend on variables such as depressive symptoms and severity of dementia and should be recognized [55,61,62,63,64]. The QUALIDEM was developed to measure QOL in persons with dementia; however, observational instruments always have the possibility of observer bias [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dementia, important domains of QOL include cognitive function, function in ADL, meaningful use of time and social behavior, and a favorable balance between positive emotion and absence of negative emotion. Several disease-specific QOL measures have been developed for the assessment of QOL in dementia influenced by Lawton’s model; however, there is still no consensus on a generic definition of QOL [21-23]. Although different conceptualizations of the multifaceted QOL converge on emotional, social, and physical well-being with dimensions and domains common to all, different people value different things [23-25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Folglich fällt auch die Abgrenzung zu nahen Konstrukten wie "Wohlbefinden", "Glück" oder "subjektive Gesundheit" schwer [8,12,15]. Über die subjektiven Lebensqualitätstheorien alter Menschen in unterschiedlichen Lebensumständen ist wenig bekannt [2]. In einer Metaanalyse [21] konnte gezeigt werden, dass bei der Beurteilung der eigenen Lebensqualität die psychische Gesundheit die größte Rolle spielt, wohingegen bei der Beurteilung der eigenen Gesundheit die körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit in den Fokus rückt.…”
Section: Hintergrund Und Fragestellungunclassified