2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.08.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in cadaver and living-related renal transplant recipients in Kuala Lumpur hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical restrictions are associated, mostly, to the frequent occurrence of comorbidity and side effects of the immunosuppressive therapy. The presence of comorbidity [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] has been considered as a predictor of worse quality of life after renal transplantation, particularly diabetes [29,30], although the quality of life of the diabetic patient submitted to dialysis improves after transplantation [1]. Besides the patients with diabetes previous to transplantation, up to 25% of all graft recipients at 3 years posttransplant have new-onset diabetes, as a side effect of the immunosuppressive drugs [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical restrictions are associated, mostly, to the frequent occurrence of comorbidity and side effects of the immunosuppressive therapy. The presence of comorbidity [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] has been considered as a predictor of worse quality of life after renal transplantation, particularly diabetes [29,30], although the quality of life of the diabetic patient submitted to dialysis improves after transplantation [1]. Besides the patients with diabetes previous to transplantation, up to 25% of all graft recipients at 3 years posttransplant have new-onset diabetes, as a side effect of the immunosuppressive drugs [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale developed by Devins et al has also been used in different patient populations with chronic diseases, including dialysis and transplanted patients [16]. The most commonly used general tool is the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (MOS-SF-36) questionnaire [10,11,14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The SF-36 consists of eight multi-item measures of physical and mental health status: ''Physical functioning''; ''Limitation in role function for physical reasons''; ''Bodily pain''; ''General health perceptions''; ''Energy/fatigue''; ''Social function''; ''Limitation in role function for emotional reasons''; and ''Emotional well-being''.…”
Section: Quality Of Life Assessment In Kidney-transplanted Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with more proper analysis of predictive variables are unfortunately scarce. Searching the literature, we identified ten such studies (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Their results are heterogenous depending on study design, composition of the target population and explored variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results are heterogenous depending on study design, composition of the target population and explored variables. Age is the best explored variable, and the majority of studies found higher age to be the most important negative predictor of perceived health status (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). The results are less clear for gender because only the study made by Wight et al, who compared cohorts of 292 dialysis and 228 transplanted patients, found female gender to be connected with worse physical functioning in kidney transplant recipients (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%