2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Life Factors and Survival After Total or Extended Maxillectomy for Sinonasal Malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…51 Various tools and questionnaires were used for measuring QOL as the EORTC Head and Neck 35 assessment ,the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UW-QOL) , the Oral Health Impact Profile -14 (OHIP-14) , Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), Mental Regarding the defect classifications, one of the selected studies used Aramany classification, 49 one used Brown classification system of defects, 50 one used Okay et al classification, 32 one used new classification 51,53 and one study described only the extension of the surgical resection. 52 The most common defect type was IIa-b Brown classification and class II okay classification. 32,[49][50][51][52] One study reported that the size of the defect affects significantly the difference between QOL scores for both lines of treatment, 50 as well as, other study reported that the size and shape of the defect, especially in patients who receive radiation therapy, represent one of the most significant negative points.…”
Section: Quality and Risk Of Bias Assessment:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…51 Various tools and questionnaires were used for measuring QOL as the EORTC Head and Neck 35 assessment ,the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UW-QOL) , the Oral Health Impact Profile -14 (OHIP-14) , Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), Mental Regarding the defect classifications, one of the selected studies used Aramany classification, 49 one used Brown classification system of defects, 50 one used Okay et al classification, 32 one used new classification 51,53 and one study described only the extension of the surgical resection. 52 The most common defect type was IIa-b Brown classification and class II okay classification. 32,[49][50][51][52] One study reported that the size of the defect affects significantly the difference between QOL scores for both lines of treatment, 50 as well as, other study reported that the size and shape of the defect, especially in patients who receive radiation therapy, represent one of the most significant negative points.…”
Section: Quality and Risk Of Bias Assessment:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 The most common defect type was IIa-b Brown classification and class II okay classification. 32,[49][50][51][52] One study reported that the size of the defect affects significantly the difference between QOL scores for both lines of treatment, 50 as well as, other study reported that the size and shape of the defect, especially in patients who receive radiation therapy, represent one of the most significant negative points. 51 Where one study reported that postoperative radiotherapy affects the functioning of obturator prostheses.…”
Section: Quality and Risk Of Bias Assessment:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations