2013
DOI: 10.3109/0167482x.2013.852534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life during the transition to parenthood in Hong Kong: a longitudinal study

Abstract: The findings of the present study highlight the need for more attention to a couple's quality of life during the transition to parenthood. Couple-based and culturally relevant interventions should be developed to assist both parents to cope with the new challenges and demands of parenthood, and thus achieve a better quality of life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chang et al studies 113,114 were conducted in Taiwan, and the Hoedjes et al study 115 was conducted in the Netherlands, but mapping both from SF-36 to EQ-5D supports that the utility score for women at 6 months post partum is approximately 0.92. A close value, 0.89, was obtained by mapping SF-12 values to EQ-5D utility scores at 6 months post partum from Ngai et al, 118 a Hong Kong study (see Table 37). Likewise, the Dutch study, by Jansen et al, 116 produced a mean utility score of 0.89 when mapped from SF-36 for women at 6 weeks post partum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Chang et al studies 113,114 were conducted in Taiwan, and the Hoedjes et al study 115 was conducted in the Netherlands, but mapping both from SF-36 to EQ-5D supports that the utility score for women at 6 months post partum is approximately 0.92. A close value, 0.89, was obtained by mapping SF-12 values to EQ-5D utility scores at 6 months post partum from Ngai et al, 118 a Hong Kong study (see Table 37). Likewise, the Dutch study, by Jansen et al, 116 produced a mean utility score of 0.89 when mapped from SF-36 for women at 6 weeks post partum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…111,112,115,116,119 Four studies had relatively small patient numbers (fewer than 250 total participants). [116][117][118]120 Only the Petrou et al 119 and the Bijlenga et al 111,112 studies utilised the EQ-5D questionnaire. Petrou et al used the EQ-5D in a general pregnancy population, with two groups of patients classified by spontaneous or non-spontaneous birth.…”
Section: Hrqol Evidence From Additional Systematic Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen studies were conducted during the first trimester of pregnancy [ 17 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 30 , 38 40 , 44 47 ], eleven were from the second trimester [ 14 , 16 , 24 , 35 , 38 – 41 , 45 , 46 , 48 ], eighteen were from the 3rd trimester [ 14 , 18 , 19 , 27 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 37 – 42 , 46 , 48 50 ] and six studies focused on the entire pregnancy [ 25 , 28 , 32 , 36 , 43 , 51 ]. In measuring the quality of life, nineteen studies used SF-36 [ 14 , 17 19 , 21 , 22 , 25 27 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 38 – 41 , 44 , 46 , 51 ], twelve studies used SF-12 [ 16 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 28 , 29 , 35 , 42 , 43 , 46 , 48 , 50 ], two studies used the WHOQOL Brief [ 32 ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant correlation was found between subjective comfort and QOL in vitality (p < 0.001) and mental health (p < 0.001) Nicholson WK (2006) [ 31 ] Ethnicity*, Income*, Social Support* Depressive Symptoms*, Multi-parity* Chronic illness Ethnicity: African Americans / Whites: PF: − 15 (− 22;-8) RP: − 28 (− 41, − 15), GH: − 11 (− 19; − 13)(, VT: − 13(− 28;-3): SF: − 7 (− 8; − 6), Income: GH -10 (− 17; − 3), SF -4 (− 5, − 3), MH -9 (− 15; − 4); Social support: PR: 30 (6,55) GH: 9 (5,15), MH: 14 (12; 16) Multi-parity (> 2 previous deliveries): PR: 18 (7;30), SF: 17 (16, 18); Depressive symptoms: PR: − 50 (p = 0.006); BP: − 12 ( p = 0.01); GH: − 10 (p = 0.01); VT = − 20 ( p > 0.001); SF = − 38 ( p < 0.01); ER: − 40 (p < 0.01); MH = − 24 (p < 0.01); Still significant in multivariable analysis Olsson C (2004) [ 32 ] Back pain The QOL was lower in the PW group with back pain group (16 ± 16) ( p = 0.000), also found in the sleep subcategories (P = 0.003), energy ( p = 0.024), pain (p = 0.000) and physical mobility (p = 0.000). The PW group with back pain had a higher rate of occupational withdrawal (57%, p = 0.005), aptitude for household work (62%, p = 0.002), Social life (35%, p = 0.007) and leisure time (68%, P = 0.001) Ramirez-Vélez (2011) [ 34 ] Age*, Educational Status*, Socioeconomic levels*, Work status*, Marital Status*, Gestational weeks Age: PF: r = − 0.17 (p < 0.05); Educational Status: GH: r = 0.34 (p < 0.001) Socioeconomic levels: PR r = 0.17 (p < 0.05); GH r = 0.29 (p < 0.001); SF: r = 0.19 (p < 0.05); ER: r = 0.27 (p < 0.01); MH: r = 0.22 (p < 0.01) Occupation (housewife): PR: r = 0.20 (p < 0.01); GH: r = 0.19 (p < 0.05); Marital Status (Being married or cohabiting): PF: r = 0.15 (p < 0.05) PR: r = 0.16 (p < 0.05) GH: r = − 0.22 (p < 0.01) VT: r = 0.19 (p < 0.05) SF: r = − 0.23 (p < 0.01) ER: r = − 0.19 (p < 0.01) MH: r = − 0.25 (p < 0.01) Setse R (2008) [ 43 ] Depressive symptoms* In the 1st trimester: PW not depressed: PF = 82; PR = 59; BP = 77; GH = 65; VT = 47; SF = 81; ER = 87; MH = 79 Depressed PW: PF = 78; PR = 39; BP = 59; GH = 51; VT = 35; SF = 54; RE = 41; MH = 57 Depressed PW had a significantly worse QOL on the following SF36 conditions: physical pain, vitality, social functioning, functioning related to mental health, mental health. These PW had QOL scores of 10–23 points and 19–31 points lower in the 2nd and 3rd trimester Shishehgar S (2014) [ 33 ] Perceived stress during pregnancy * Significant relationship between QOL and stress rate ( p ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality of life is subjective by nature and is associated both with health-related and with non-medically related factors [ 3 ]. Women experience changes in their quality of life during pregnancy and the postpartum period [ 4 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%