2002
DOI: 10.1345/1542-6270(2002)036<1851:qolaia>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-of-Life Assessment in an Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with hospital admission, there are a number of potential benefits for the patient of being at home, including improved psychological outcomes, less disruption to family life and reduced hospital-acquired infections1 2 There are also benefits to the healthcare system, including improved patient flow and greater cost-effectiveness for the same management 3. With changing models of care and greater financial pressure on hospitals, the impetus for home-based care is likely to increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with hospital admission, there are a number of potential benefits for the patient of being at home, including improved psychological outcomes, less disruption to family life and reduced hospital-acquired infections1 2 There are also benefits to the healthcare system, including improved patient flow and greater cost-effectiveness for the same management 3. With changing models of care and greater financial pressure on hospitals, the impetus for home-based care is likely to increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, studies show equivalent outcomes to inpatient care, reduced re-presentation rates and higher patient and carer satisfaction rates 3–5. OPAT is one of the interventions that can be delivered by an HITH programme, and in adults it has been shown to improve physical, social and emotional quality-of-life parameters compared with hospital-based treatment 3. However, there are potential risks such as adverse events at home and suboptimal decision-making regarding antibiotics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] With appropriate patient selection, it has been shown to be safe, efficacious, and cost-effective. [9][10][11][12][13][14] The ability to manage patients in the community setting provides the freedom for patients to return to work or educational facilities, reduces pressure on hospital bed utilization, and reduces the risk of developing nosocomial infections. [9][10][11][12][13] There are various models of care for OPAT, which include hospital-based infusion centres, nursing outreach services to patient homes for the administration of antibiotics, and administration by self or family members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted in Australia and USA estimated that the annual cost savings associated with the use of elastomeric intravenous pumps can be up to US$500 000 18 19. Furthermore, a prospective study found that patients had improved physical, mental and emotional experience when they were transferred from the hospital-based treatment to home-based treatment 20. Ceftaroline is effective in the treatment of infections caused by MDR Gram-positive bacteria 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%