Abstract:Introduction: In the phase 2 CELEST study, positive efficacy results were obtained with the Janus kinase 1 inhibitor upadacitinib for adult patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. We present the health-related quality of life and work productivity improvement results with upadacitinib from CELEST. Methods: CELEST (NCT02365649) was a double-blind study where patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1 in the 16-week induction period to placebo or upadacitinib 3 mg twice daily (BID), 6 mg BID, 12 mg BID, 24 m… Show more
“…The Peyrin-Biroulet L et al [45] study was conducted during the phase 2b CELEST clinical trial. During the maintenance phase, patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to receive upadacitinib at doses of 3 mg/12 h (n = 32), 12 mg/12 h (n = 29) and 24 mg/24 h (n = 19).…”
Conventional therapy is the most commonly used treatment for Crohn’s disease (CD), but it does not always achieve disease control, which is why the use of biologic drugs is increasing. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs in adult patients diagnosed with moderate–severe CD. An intensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Medline to collect phase 2 or 3 clinical trials published between 2018 and 2023 that were randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind trials analyzing the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs in adult patients diagnosed with CD. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Thirteen clinical trials evaluating eight biologic drugs were included. Upadacitinib, vedolizumab, adalimumab, guselkumab, mirikizumab, ustekinumab and risankizumab showed statistically significant efficacy across different clinical, endoscopic, histological, genetic, biomarker or quality-of-life parameters. However, PF-00547659 only showed statistically significant results for the CDAI-70 at week 12. In terms of safety, the incidence and severity of adverse effects were analyzed, with all drugs being well tolerated and presenting a good safety profile since most adverse effects were mild. Biologic drugs can be considered an effective and safe option for the treatment of moderate–severe CD in adult patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional therapy.
“…The Peyrin-Biroulet L et al [45] study was conducted during the phase 2b CELEST clinical trial. During the maintenance phase, patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to receive upadacitinib at doses of 3 mg/12 h (n = 32), 12 mg/12 h (n = 29) and 24 mg/24 h (n = 19).…”
Conventional therapy is the most commonly used treatment for Crohn’s disease (CD), but it does not always achieve disease control, which is why the use of biologic drugs is increasing. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs in adult patients diagnosed with moderate–severe CD. An intensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Medline to collect phase 2 or 3 clinical trials published between 2018 and 2023 that were randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind trials analyzing the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs in adult patients diagnosed with CD. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Thirteen clinical trials evaluating eight biologic drugs were included. Upadacitinib, vedolizumab, adalimumab, guselkumab, mirikizumab, ustekinumab and risankizumab showed statistically significant efficacy across different clinical, endoscopic, histological, genetic, biomarker or quality-of-life parameters. However, PF-00547659 only showed statistically significant results for the CDAI-70 at week 12. In terms of safety, the incidence and severity of adverse effects were analyzed, with all drugs being well tolerated and presenting a good safety profile since most adverse effects were mild. Biologic drugs can be considered an effective and safe option for the treatment of moderate–severe CD in adult patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional therapy.
“…The total number of participants in this review was 7463 and ranged between 108 and 1281. Three studies investigated infliximab [31][32][33], three studies investigated certolizumab pegol [34][35][36], three studies investigated ustekinumab [37], two studies investigated natalizumab [38,39] and one study each investigated adalimumab [40], filgotinib [41], upadacitinib [42], tofacitinib [43] and apilimod mesylate [44]. Nine were induction studies, and six were maintenance studies.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All outcomes were rated as having low risks in domain 4 (Table 1 and Figure 2). IM UNITI [37] Ustekinumab 1281 Intervention All HRQoL outcomes 18 ENCORE [38] Natalizumab 509 Intervention All HRQoL outcomes 3 ENACT 2 [39] Natalizumab 339 Intervention All HRQoL outcomes 24 FITZROY [41] Filgotinib 174 Intervention All HRQoL outcomes 1 CELEST [42] Upadacitinib 220 Intervention All HRQoL outcomes 20 Tofacitinib [43] Tofacitinib 280 Not reported All HRQoL outcomes 8…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All outcomes were rated as having low risks in domain 4 (Table 1 and Figure 2). Intervention All HRQoL outcomes 24 FITZROY [41] Filgotinib 174 Intervention All HRQoL outcomes 1 CELEST [42] Upadacitinib 220 Intervention All HRQoL outcomes 20 Tofacitinib [43] Tofacitinib 280 Not reported All HRQoL outcomes 8…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CELEST study compared five doses of oral upadacitinib (3 mg, 6 mg, 12 mg or 24 mg twice daily or 24 mg once daily) with a placebo as induction therapy [42,50]. Changes in the mean IBDQ total score at weeks 8 and 16 were only statistically significant in the 6 mg and 24 mg twice-daily groups (p ≤ 0.05, compared to the placebo).…”
Crohn’s disease (CD) leads to a poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This review aimed to investigate the effect of biological agents and small-molecule drugs in improving the HRQoL of patients with moderate to severe CD. We adopted a systematic protocol to search PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which was supplemented with manual searches. Eligible studies were RCTs that matched the research objective based on population, intervention, comparison and outcomes. Studies in paediatric populations, reviews and conference abstracts were excluded. Covidence was used for screening and data extraction. We assessed all research findings using RoB2 and reported them narratively. We included 16 multicentre, multinational RCTs in this review. Of the 15 studies that compared the effect of an intervention to a placebo, 9 were induction studies and 6 investigated maintenance therapy. Of these, 13 studies showed a significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the HRQoL of patients with CD. One non-inferiority study compared the intervention with another active drug and favoured the intervention. This systematic review reported a substantial improvement in the HRQoL of patients with CD using biological agents and small-molecule drugs. These pharmaceutical substances have the potential to improve the HRQoL of patients with CD. However, further large clinical trials with long-term follow-up are essential to validate these findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.