2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00919.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life and voice following endoscopic resection or radiotherapy for early glottic cancer

Abstract: All outcome measures were applicable and acceptable to the patient group. Overall QoL and voice appears similar despite treatment arm, apart from the emotional subscale of the VoiSS. A randomized controlled trial is required to further assess this question.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
66
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of these used blinded specialist assessors listening to voice recordings (Rydell, Rosier, Loughran & Sjogren) [9][10][11][12] , and three did not describe a blinding method (Hirano, Elner, Nunez-Batalla). [13][14][15] Five studies reported no statistically significant differences between RT and TLM, while Rydell 9 reported significantly better scores for RT.…”
Section: Voice Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four of these used blinded specialist assessors listening to voice recordings (Rydell, Rosier, Loughran & Sjogren) [9][10][11][12] , and three did not describe a blinding method (Hirano, Elner, Nunez-Batalla). [13][14][15] Five studies reported no statistically significant differences between RT and TLM, while Rydell 9 reported significantly better scores for RT.…”
Section: Voice Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient's perception of the vocal disability was measured using questionnaires in seven studies with conflicting results: Loughran, 11 Sjogren, 12 Bahannan, 22 Goor 23 and Oridate 24 reported no significant differences in overall scores between RT and TLM groups. Goor 23 reported better scores for TLM on the emotional scale and several voice-specific questions of the VHI but similar overall scores, whereas Loughran 11 reported better scores for RT on the emotional scale of the VoiSS.…”
Section: Voice Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VHI was used as a means to measure the voicerelated handicap in different disease groups, such as organic dysphonias 15 , presbyphonia 16 , professional use of one's voice 17,18 , gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux disorders 19,20,21 , adduction and abduction spasmodic dysphonia 22,23,24 , thyroplasties 25,26,27 , microsurgery for benign 28,29 and malignant 30,31,32 disorders, radiography for laryngeal cancer 33 , use of tracheoesophageal 34 and speech therapy 35,36 . Numerous authors compared other methods of vocal assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these two modalities alone do not specifi cally evaluate the resulting handicap as the patient perceives it. Use of a structured questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life in these patients is required for this [5][6][7][8]. One of the most widely used dysphonia -specifi c quality of life questionnaire is the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) developed by Jacobson et al in 1997 [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%