2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life after open versus laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for unilateral inguinal hernias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Na avaliação de qualidade de vida de pacientes submetidos aos reparos por via pré-peritoneal transinguinal aberto (TIPP) e por laparoscópico com tela extraperitoneal total (TEP) não foram evidenciadas divergências na qualidade de vida (Corthals et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Na avaliação de qualidade de vida de pacientes submetidos aos reparos por via pré-peritoneal transinguinal aberto (TIPP) e por laparoscópico com tela extraperitoneal total (TEP) não foram evidenciadas divergências na qualidade de vida (Corthals et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Therefore, completely laparoscopic repair (CLR) for RIH that develops after PAOR has been rarely reported in Japan. 11,12 Operation for a recurrent inguinal hernia is common (12%), and the risk of re-recurrence is high. In all guidelines of the international hernia societies, laparo-endoscopic recurrent inguinal hernia repair is recommended after failed open anterior tissue or Lichtenstein repair and open anterior repair in Lichtenstein technique after failed posterior laparo-endoscopic repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is consensus that long-term quality of life is better in operated patients than in those for whom surgery is not performed, despite some cost-effectiveness studies suggesting that observation may be a cost-effective alternative in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic male patients 33 . The hernia operation, for many authors, serves as an indicator of surgical quality provided by different institutions and countries, establishing a scientific basis for the critical evaluation of the procedure and the improvement of healthcare systems 3 , 11 , 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%